Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would a 120hZ LED 46 have motion blur?

Kurb

By Kurb,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Zcustom Newbie

Zcustom

Posted
Posted

Two reasons I don't like them.... most of their screens are shiny and reflect lights, windows etc...

They are very hot... and are energy hogs.

Their pictures are very good, but if there are reflections on the screen, it drives me nuts.

fair enough, I was just curious because I always hear bad things about them. I have a 42" Samsung Plasma and I love it.

If I could ever sell my Supra I plan on getting a 60" Samsung Plasma

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lymelizzard Newbie

lymelizzard

Posted
Posted

Two reasons I don't like them.... most of their screens are shiny and reflect lights, windows etc...

They are very hot... and are energy hogs.

Their pictures are very good, but if there are reflections on the screen, it drives me nuts.

I got a 60" last year Zenith. I was afraid of Plasma (burn in etc). So far all I can say is WOW. The energy sticker say something like 40.00 per year in power consumption. It's been used with Directv/blue ray/ps3. You will have some image retention but it goes away. So don't be afraid of new good brand name plasma.

If you have a dark room go Plasma, if there is a lot of light go led.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chimera Community Regular

Chimera

Posted
Posted

Matte screens are a definite. If you go LED, make sure its fully lit (skip the edge lit varieties, some have very uneven lighting).

As I said before, sports are fine in 120 or 240 hz. It looks great if you're using bunny ears: satellite and cable signals are very compressed.

Movies can be hard to watch - I guess you could get used to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted

We've had higher-end Samsung 120 Hz LCDs for almost 4 years now and I love them. 46" is actually the size in our basement, so you should be alright. That said, some of the lower-end models can look a little chintzy at times, so definitely research what you're going to buy. With the prices of TVs as low as they are, I'm not sure it wouldn't be worth stepping up to a higher end model and avoiding all doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mav1234
      PFF Best Rookies so far: Two Panthers

      By mav1234 · Posted

      Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • mav1234
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion in Here)

      By mav1234 · Posted

      At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • amcoolio
      Trade deadline

      By amcoolio · Posted

      Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...