Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Happens if DeAngelo Williams is Cut or Traded?


ZackAttack23

Recommended Posts

really don't need anybody, unless a cheap-ass free agent that could complement the two guys we have now is a better option than what we have a third-string.

spend money and resources on fixing the offensive line the backs we keep will look better, and so will our quarterback, and all three phases will feed off of each other like the symbiosis you expect to see on a winning football team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

really don't need anybody, unless a cheap-ass free agent that could complement the two guys we have now is a better option than what we have a third-string.

spend money and resources on fixing the offensive line the backs we keep will look better, and so will our quarterback, and all three phases will feed off of each other like the symbiosis you expect to see on a winning football team.

If we have a better Offensive Coordinator next year, it will be different. Who knows, we might ACTUALLY use our RB's! But yes we do need to fix our OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

draft one in the 6th or 5th at highest. We need to stop putting so much towards running backs we dont use. We would be fine without DWill where were at since we do have Tolbert

I agree for the most part about what you said, except what we do with RB's currently in our play-calling won't matter with new coaching staff next year if we get one. Also Tolbert can play RB or FB. Though we could use a better blocking FB, Tolbert can play RB, TE, or FB. That's why I think we keep Tolbert at FB. Hope I didn't confuse you lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...