Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Busy day for Bears


dimbee

Recommended Posts

Stats don't make you proven. If you look at NFL.com annually, you'll often find the QBs at the top of the stat lists are also guys who missed the playoffs.

What does that have to do with whether a QB is proven or not? There are plenty of QBs who were good/proven but stuck on poo teams.

As to the "hater" tag, I know there's a fair amount of Bear hate on this forum, but I'm not one of the people that's in on it. You're pulling a bit of a persecution complex here. There are things I like about the Bears (Lovie Smith and Matt Forte, for example) but Cutler isn't one of them.

Hardly pulling any persecution complex. LOL. Just pointing out that ever since the day the trade was announced, you've been poopooing it and calling him the next Jeff George. How would you categorize that? Considering that in George's 13 (or however many) seasons, he never had a season that even matched Cutler's 3rd season in the league.

Bottom Line: You believe Cutler is the Bears savior. Truthfully, given what they gave up to get him, he'd better be. Me? I'm not convinced. When the season rolls around, we'll see.

Savior? No, I haven't said that. What I believe is he is a young, very talented QB who has shown that he can produce at the NFL level and I'm excited about the Bears hitching the wagon to him long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm satisfied with the trade, you have to give to get.

And yes, the Bears gave up a lot, but in order to get a young, talented QB like Cutler that is what it takes.

Savior, hardly.

Does his presence under center make the Bears better? Without a doubt. Does it change the fact that they still need help in other areas, no. A savior would make everything ok, and no one player makes everything ok. He is a tremendous upgrade at the most important position on the field.

Kyle Orton is a good guy, an average QB, and no longer a Bear, so I really don't care what he does anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does that have to do with whether a QB is proven or not? There are plenty of QBs who were good/proven but stuck on poo teams.

Hardly pulling any persecution complex. LOL. Just pointing out that ever since the day the trade was announced, you've been poopooing it and calling him the next Jeff George. How would you categorize that? Considering that in George's 13 (or however many) seasons, he never had a season that even matched Cutler's 3rd season in the league.

Savior? No, I haven't said that. What I believe is he is a young, very talented QB who has shown that he can produce at the NFL level and I'm excited about the Bears hitching the wagon to him long term.

If a guy hasn't shown he can be clutch in the playoffs, I don't accept him as proven, regardless of whether his not getting to the playoffs is his team's fault more than his.

Again, stats look nice on a stats sheet. They can be used in debates, but they're largely useless when discussing how good a guy could be in a playoff game he's never played in.

And as to Cutler, if you look back you'll see I disliked him long before he was traded to the Bears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tony Dungy has a take too.

PFT: Dungy questions Cutler's maturity

Consider Tony Dungy officially skeptical about Chicago Bears quarterback Jay Cutler, raising questions about his attitude and his game.

The normally low-key former Indianapolis Colts coach was critical of Cutler’s maturity and leadership during a conference call to announce that Dungy and Rodney Harrison have been hired for NBC’s Sunday night studio program, according to Fred Mitchell of the Chicago Tribune.

Dungy woudn’t even proclaim that Cutler is the best quarterback in the NFC North.

“That remains to be seen,” Dungy said. “He is a very talented guy who can throw the ball very well. But quarterbacking is so much about leadership and so much about doing things under pressure. There is going to be a lot of pressure on him. …

“We’ll see about his maturity level. That’s what I would question. And some of the things that happened leading to him leaving Denver that would concern me as a head coach. He can make all of the throws, but quarterbacking is much more than just making throws.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you say he was a "proven" QB in his day?

Will it help you feel better about Jay Cutler?

(that is what you're looking for here, right?)

To be brutally honest, regardless of what I have to say about him, comparing Cutler to Archie Manning at this point in his career is a stretch Mister Fantastic would have trouble with.

The only thing they have in common is not competing on the big stage, but Manning was at it a lot longer than Cutler has been at this point. And no, Manning wasn't tried in the playoff fire (never even came close) so it's impossible to say that he would have been just as good in the postseason. You can theorize, but ultimately it's just "what ifs".

I've already said I'm not convinced Cutler will be worth what was given up to get him. You believe he will be. In the season to come (and future seasons) we'll see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will it help you feel better about Jay Cutler?

(that is what you're looking for here, right?)

To be brutally honest, regardless of what I have to say about him, comparing Cutler to Archie Manning at this point in his career is a stretch Mister Fantastic would have trouble with.

Where did I compare the 2 (and I knew that would be your reply)? You're the one who said, "If a guy hasn't shown he can be clutch in the playoffs, I don't accept him as proven, regardless of whether his not getting to the playoffs is his team's fault more than his." Well, Archie Manning never made it to the playoffs. Thus my question as to whether he is "proven" in your book or not. I would assume that in your estimation, using that quantification, that he is not.

:willy_nilly:

Your "voice of reason" is losing credibility :smilewinkgrin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by dimbee View Post

I wonder what is Mr Scots opinion of Archie Manning's career?

Nothing?

Archie was a great QB surrounded by a poo team. Cutler doesn't have that problem as long as he has the heart to handle it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did I compare the 2 (and I knew that would be your reply)? You're the one who said, "If a guy hasn't shown he can be clutch in the playoffs, I don't accept him as proven, regardless of whether his not getting to the playoffs is his team's fault more than his." Well, Archie Manning never made it to the playoffs. Thus my question as to whether he is "proven" in your book or not. I would assume that in your estimation, using that quantification, that he is not.

:willy_nilly:

Your "voice of reason" is losing credibility :smilewinkgrin:

If you say so :rolleyes:

You asked my opinion of Manning, and I gave it. But we both know the whole point of your argument is to make Cutler sound better, in this case by attacking my opinion. If the mental gymnastics of it all helps you feel better about Cutler, or about your own football knowledge, have at it.

However, since Tony Dungy has essentially the same take I do, and Dungy isn't just a fan like you or me, I'm wondering if you have a better response for Tony's stance than "I read that two days ago".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sorry man you lost me at "Teppers have evolved as owners". Limped into playoffs at 8-9 not even above .500 Tepper is trash as an owner bro and that's not even a discussion at this point. 37-83 w/l ratio. Nuff said.... Morgan tho, he's cooking and it ain't cuz of Teppers leadership
    • After listening to Morgan's presser twice, I came away with some key beliefs. First of all, I don't think he's a bullshitter. What you see is what you get. When he says something, he means it.  The Teppers really have evolved as owners. Morgan has mentioned how they're easy to work with--a pleasure to work with a few times now. There seems to be a good relationship between all of them (and include Dave Canales on that). We'll see if it lasts. Yes, no one wanted to come to Carolina with the previous management, but that seems to have changed. The team signed arguably the top Edge, LB and OT on the market, two of them on pretty good deals and one on what I'll say is "not a bad one." And, credit Sunshine Dave "Flowers and Cotton Candy" Canales for helping to change the culture. Morgan mentioned getting guys--and I'm paraphrasing--that are not only great football players but great people. Don't look for us to be acquiring any James Pearce types anytime soon, just saying. We'll see if that holds true in the future. Dan Morgan really has set up the Panthers to take the BPA/BAP. He mentioned it at least a couple of times, and he doesn't seem pressured to pinpoint a particular position. He just wants quality players that will help the team. This is how it's going to be (to your joy or dismay, probably for as long as he's here), and personally I love it. Many of us know how Morgan was when he played: aggressive! That's what he's going to be when making acquisitions. He explicitly said it, and emphasized it. All avenues are open (think FA, waivers...the draft)! Personally, as long as it's controlled aggression and not reckless aggression, I love it.  On KP: "Mobility is big in this league."  He basically says if another QB is the BPA while drafting--we're going by our board, people--we're going to add them.        ...  
    • Canes are so fascinating. Despite inconsistent defense and poor goalie play they keep winning. 
×
×
  • Create New...