Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maaaaaaan if Cam did this!


jtnc

Recommended Posts

I'm dead serious. With the game on the line, there is no question in my mind who I would rather have with the ball in their hand. It's not even a debate.

it really is a debate, since you can't just stick The Golden Calf of Bristol in there for the last 2 minutes of the game... which is about the only time he is really productive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how is it logical that hundreds of intelligent people on this board that completely disagree with are wrong, all wrong, all of them, and that you're the one person - the ONE person - that's actually got it all figured out?

don't you question yourself just a smidgen?

Hundreds of intelligent people on this board disagreed with me when I said Clausen would suck ass too.

Hundreds of intelligent people disagreed with me when I said The Golden Calf of Bristol would make the playoffs last year.

Hundreds of intelligent people disagreed with me when i said it in week 4 last year that Cam couldn't close and he had one of the worst 4th quarter ratings for a QB. Two seasons later we've all seen it.

"The minority is sometimes right; the majority is always wrong."-GBS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hundreds of intelligent people on this board disagreed with me when I said Clausen would suck ass too.

Hundreds of intelligent people disagreed with me when I said The Golden Calf of Bristol would make the playoffs last year.

Hundreds of intelligent people disagreed with me when i said it in week 4 last year that Cam couldn't close and he had one of the worst 4th quarter ratings for a QB. Two seasons later we've all seen it.

those are different cases entirely and if you think it's in anyway a direct correlation you really are beyond help

"The minority is sometimes right; the majority is always wrong."-GBS

oh good an ambiguous truism being applied as absolutism no wonder you post such stupid tripe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

those are different cases entirely and if you think it's in anyway a direct correlation you really are beyond help

oh good an ambiguous truism being applied as absolutism no wonder you post such stupid tripe

Whatever you say. You asked me why, and I answered you. Because over the long term, I've studied, analyzed and predicted enough things correctly to believe in what I am talking about. I didn't just say the things I did. I analyzed them. I looked into them. I researched. And whether that aligns with the majority of Huddle thinking or not, doesn't sway me nor should it. I often find myself on the side of the minority. That's ok with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever you say. You asked me why, and I answered you. Because over the long term, I've studied, analyzed and predicted enough things correctly to believe in what I am talking about. I didn't just say the things I did. I analyzed them. I looked into them. I researched. And whether that aligns with the majority of Huddle thinking or not, doesn't sway me nor should it. I often find myself on the side of the minority. That's ok with me.

i bet you're popular at target

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you wonder why you don't work any any FO?

Because my experience is in automobiles, finance, account executive in sales and advertising and have no experience in football operations? But I'm ok with what I do now. I prefer being my own boss and setting my own hours rather than working for a clueless buffoon like Richardson. Owners like him is the reason I quit working for people. They tend to get in the way of you doing a good job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny how all the whack jobs stick together.

And right on cue, here comes Grits to imply that Hurney was fired because he drafted Cam.

He was, just like the scouting report predicted.

""Negatives: Played in a simplified, run-first, dive-option read offense with very basic high-low reads. Worked exclusively out of the gun and was very quick to run at the first flash of coverage. Limited field vision — does not process the passing game. Inconsistent throwing mechanics with a flick delivery — generates all of his power from his upper-body strength and too often arms the ball. Streaky passer with spotty accuracy. Makes his receivers work hard and throws into coverage. Does not spin a tight spiral. Very disingenuous — has a fake smile, comes off as very scripted and has a selfish, me-first makeup. Always knows where the cameras are and plays to them. Has an enormous ego with a sense of entitlement that continually invites trouble and makes him believe he is above the law — does not command respect from teammates and always will struggle to win a locker room. Only a one-year producer. Lacks accountability, focus and trustworthiness — is not punctual, seeks shortcuts and sets a bad example. Immature and has had issues with authority. Not dependable."

An overhyped, high-risk, high-reward selection with a glaring bust factor, Newton is sure to be drafted more highly than he should and could foreclose a risk-taking GM's job and taint a locker room"

Dude was a freaking prophet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watching those throws Drake Maye was making on a dead run threading lasers into tight coverage on the sidelines over and over in that game against the Bills... these people need to go watch that and be honest with themselves.
    • why rig the scenario with the "as a passer" tag.   I mean, I assume you do that because Bryce needs help in the argument.  If we are just talking players and no contacts?   I mean, give me Young over Russell Wilson.   That's it.   I'd put him on par w/ Penix, Fields, McCarthy and Rattler,  so that's a wash.  Give me everyone else over Bryce.  And I'm not handicapping the other players as passing only because when you start doing that it's really meaningless.   
    • McCarthy to date, for sure. That's a very early sample size, however. Russell Wilson is a backup. Not sure Wilson wouldn't be better suited to our offense specifically, but at the bare minimum it's basically a wash. Hurts I would generally disagree with. I do think Hurts is likely to be less than stellar in our offense. Justin Fields - Agree. Fields is a significant threat on the ground but he sees the field as badly or worse than Bryce. And that's with significantly more reps. Spencer Rattler - I honestly thought this would be an easier call that it is. TBH, right now Rattler looks a lot better. Really almost across the board. Kyler - Murray is better. Basically across the board. Not significantly better, mind you. Trevor Lawrence is more debatable than it seems. Low completion percentages, tons of TO's.....he really has been quite bad this year in Jax. He is considerably more talented than Bryce but the results have been marginally better. Tua - Tua is a little more dynamic of a player but he is a TO machine. Tend to agree. Caleb Williams. Not sure on this. Williams is still struggling to be consistent but his upper end is WAY higher than Bryce. He shows it fairlu frequently, as well. Probably would rather be working through Caleb's issues than Bryce. Penix - 100%. This guy stinks. Cam Ward. This is a little tough. Again, far higher ceiling on Ward and he shows flashes but it's been a mess there in Tenn. Probably lean towards Bryce here.
×
×
  • Create New...