Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 Choices

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
Posted

1) Keep Rivera, find a new GM, 2013 another tryout forRivera.

2) Fire Rivera, find new GM and possibly miss out on top coaching candidates due to the time it takes to hire a GM.

3) Fire Rivera, hire one coach/GM to take full control of the team.

Which do you go with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dash Global Newbie

Dash Global

Posted
Posted

Id have to know who we would be replacing Rivera with first.

The think I really like about Rivera x's and o's wise is he is good a D but always isnt conservative on O. Although at times Chud can call dumb plays.

The question about Rivera is his personnel managing / motivating.

In there I love our schemes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bj-Monster23 Newbie

Bj-Monster23

Posted
Posted

You have to go with 2. One thing you have to realize with the GM search is that they have been evaluating throughout the season. Ernie already knows who he plans on bringing in. They just got to get the interview process over in a timely fashion. Don't be surprise if the interviews gets going early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Tom Cat

Guest Tom Cat

Posted
Posted

Number 2 - I dont believe hiring a gm is going to take more than a few days after Monday - the top candidates for head coach arent going to be falling into our laps anyway - theyre going to go to the glamor jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberjag Newbie

Cyberjag

Posted
Posted

I'll add that it took Mr. Scot maybe an afternoon to put together a good list of candidates along with a short bio and some analysis on each one. And he's not even an NFL insider. If he can do that, then what has Accorsi been doing all this time?

I don't like gambling, but I think banking on them having a top three list is a safe bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nicbsbll2 Newbie

Nicbsbll2

Posted
Posted

Number 2 - I dont believe hiring a gm is going to take more than a few days after Monday - the top candidates for head coach arent going to be falling into our laps anyway - theyre going to go to the glamor jobs.

In the NFL the ' glamour' jobs are the ones that are open.

But I agree that it won't take long to get the new GM so option 2 is my vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • travisura
      Favorite Packer Panthers memory

      By travisura · Posted

      “Y’all been watching film, huh? That’s cool, watch this.”
    • strato
      Favorite Packer Panthers memory

      By strato · Posted

      Really? Wow. Sorry. Got my timeline messed up. I remember someone claiming to be Graham’s mom on the old Charlotte.com board so I guess it was a long time ago that he was here. I guess I thought he was after Kasay. 
    • TD alt
      Nick Scott may be doing better than thought.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Nick Scott has gotten his share of Huddle hate, but I came across this SI article by Zach Roberts when I was researching recently released Quandre Diggs, speculated to be a better option  (https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2025/11/07/breaking-titans-cut-former-three-time-pro-bowler-quandre-diggs-4-destinations-ranked/3/), but getting back to Nick Scott... Now to be fair, the observation on Scott was before the Packers game, but the stats couldn't have changed that much, and may have gotten better.   "At some point during virtually every Carolina Panthers game, you have probably found yourself grumbling about Nick Scott. The much-maligned safety has seemingly been out of position a lot or has failed to make a play. The eye test has often let him down. "But that's why stats are so helpful. Sometimes, the eye test, especially for fans, is unreliable. On occasion, advanced metrics help make sense of things and lend more clarity. In the case of Scott, they make him look like a much better safety than any of us would've guessed. "In coverage, Scott has given up just 15 yards and an average of five yards per catch. That's the lowest among safeties, leading superstars like Julian Love, Talanoa Hafunga, Quandre Diggs, Kerby Joseph, Kyle Hamilton, and Minkah Fitzpatrick. "In FI%, the safety leads all his counterparts once again at 40%. Brian Branch, Camren Kinchens, and Xavier McKinney are some notable names he leads. He's been pretty excellent in pass coverage, which is crucial for the Panthers." For those wondering, "FI" means forced incompletions. Now I'm way past trying to figure out why X links aren't embedding for me like they used to, but here you go: https://x.com/dacornerman/status/1981363757608513632?t=rx_5iLjp8_y5huNcg_y1nA&s=19   Suffice it to say that Scott may not be as bad as some have led on.    https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/onsi/news/much-maligned-panthers-db-way-better-than-think      
×
×
  • Create New...