Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Superbowl HCs (first 2 yrs)


CRA

Recommended Posts

If he took 10 steps back....he simply wouldn't have more wins and finish better in his division as a result (losing his Pro Bowl C, best corner)-

Cam Newton can win championships. His relationship there is most important. Not all rings are won bc of great coaching....but more so handling of special players. RR has at least one of those that can take over a season as he matures.

So beating teams like Philly, Oakland and SD means a lot right? We loss to the worst team in the league and Brady Quinn. We couldnt hold a lead over the Bucs. And that NO team is awful. Other than the Atl game all those late wins mean $hit to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll save you time. A large majority of coaches who started out with back to back losing seasons didn't go on to to post winning records, much less a Super Bowl. They just ended up being failures.

A large a majority of all coaches (winning seasons, losing seasons, whatever criteria you pick) don't win rings.....overwhelming majority of all coaches are fired and deemed failures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a particular reason Rivera was canned right after the game?

Word in Chicago was.....Lovie felt uncomfortable his team got to a Superbowl on the back of Rivera's D and Hester. Rivera was becoming a threat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A large a majority of all coaches (winning seasons, losing seasons, whatever criteria you pick) don't win rings.....overwhelming majority of all coaches are fired and deemed failures.

Uh. Yes. Most coaches fail. The point being that the deck is stacked even more when they start out as poorly as Rivera has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Word in Chicago was.....Lovie felt uncomfortable his team got to a Superbowl on the back of Rivera's D and Hester. Rivera was becoming a threat.

Or the fact that Rivera was foisted onto him and Smith didn't need him to build a good defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're saying just by the numbers, Ron Rivera's coaching acumen can only be matched by none other than Bill Belichick and Tom Coughlin?

No, saying by the numbers.....coaches grow and develop like players.

Bill Belichick wasn't the same coach year 2 as 10. DeAngelo Williams wasn't the same player year 2 as 3.

Simply pointing out.....2 years doesn't define someone. That is the point. Not comparing RR really to anyone. Moving on too soon....sometimes hurts you and rewards others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, saying by the numbers.....coaches grow and develop like players.

Bill Belichick wasn't the same coach year 2 as 10. DeAngelo Williams wasn't the same player year 2 as 3.

Simply pointing out.....2 years doesn't define someone. That is the point. Not comparing RR really to anyone. Moving on too soon....sometimes hurts you and rewards others.

It could be, but my problem is all of Rivera's wins have come against teams with little to play for or losing records. Too many times our team has come out looking unprepared and that is unacceptable. He's made too many questionable decisions and quotes for me to give him the benefit of the doubt and think he's not who he has appeared to be thus far.

But, my opinion is of little consequence. I'm just a fan and have to accept the decision that has been made for us and hope for the best, but I fear it was the wrong one yet again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this logic is fuging stupid

The everything doesn't happen overnight logic is stupid?

That is one reason Rivera should stay.

being handicapped by a fired GM is another reason he deserved another year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean I think its a bit disingenuous to call basically anyone here a casual fan. I don't think the casual fan creates a profile then logs into it, in the offseason, to comments on mundane offseason topics.. I dont think anyone on here would be considered a casual fan. That said, I get your point. My POV is from the player. They sign this contract, move their family because of these contracts. When Clowney came him, we basically had a coming home party for him.  So yeah, I get why we did it and I know that ultimately the owner doesnt 'save' money, but I can feel for the human side of the player, which is why I want them to get all they can while they can. 
    • My guess is the NBA will either send Flagg back “home” to the Northeast in Brooklyn or Washington, or San Antonio so that they can keep building around Wemby. If I was a betting man I would take the odds on the Spurs. This definitely feels like a #1 pick that they will rig.
    • In fairness, she is ensuring she is talked about.  People really aren’t going out there way to bring her up.  It’s some weird poo.  She would end up getting talked about given her actions if she was 40. Bill realizing some of these high end “companions” got a game of their own.  That’s what I don’t think Bill saw coming.  
×
×
  • Create New...