Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So... Who does Rivera fire/replace from his staff?


TruCatzFan

Recommended Posts

Now that HE has job security... Will he make any moves and get rid of anybody from his staff?

Does he have mercy on his staff, as JR did for him, or will he bring out the old axe!?

I'd really like to see Chud get the boot in favor of Norv Turner... But I could also see Ron running with what he's got!

I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall during that meeting...

So fellas, what say you? Does he axe anyone? Or does he go with what he's got?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought special teams play improved once Richard Rogers got comfortable in the role (took a few games) but for the final 4-5 games special teams looked a bit better. Would like to see what he can do with a full offseason as prep and more control of personnel.

Coaches on the bubble? Offensive ones - Chud, the running backs coach Settle and maybe Graves, the WR coach. Possibly Shula? With the Scott Turner and Norv Turner connection, I hope we replace Chud w/ Norv.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep Chud on the right track and get a real QB coach. Hire Weinke, Jim Zorn, George Whitfield...

Eh, Whitfield and Weinke make a shitload of money on providing private lessons, doubt they'd be willing to give it up to be a full-time coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought special teams play improved once Richard Rogers got comfortable in the role (took a few games) but for the final 4-5 games special teams looked a bit better. Would like to see what he can do with a full offseason as prep and more control of personnel.

Coaches on the bubble? Offensive ones - Chud, the running backs coach Settle and maybe Graves, the WR coach. Possibly Shula? With the Scott Turner and Norv Turner connection, I hope we replace Chud w/ Norv.

This just made me think of Hadooki Nakamorons fake punt fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just made me think of Hadooki Nakamorons fake punt fail.

Not every play works every time. In retrospect, yeah - pretty dumb. To be honest, I sure as heck did not see that coming. Very uncharacteristic of us - but even so - special teams did improve slightly once Rodgers took over full time. Def. have to do something about Adams and our return situation, but we covered pretty well and made great tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...