Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Son of a Beach: Mock Numero Uno (1)


davos

Recommended Posts

Aloha Huddle! Here's to setting a better tone up in this forum, the Falcons NOT winning the SB, and the Spring coming fast.

*Note: this fake football draft is completely biased and based off of my lackluster non-expert fan oriented opinion and I'm going to have fun doing it. (photos and boobs added for visual effect and to make this seem better than it actually is)

who-are-the-spiciest-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-models-984067916-oct-9-2012-1-600x700.jpg

Non-draft quickie with little to no research or cap knowledge: I think we'll need to focus on WR, OL, NT, OLB, and DB when Gettleman starts doing his sh*t.

Draft time....

brooklyn-decker-6.jpg

(strategy: build from the lines out by not picking a lineman in the first) :)

I think Fisher, Warmack, Banks, & Milliner are gone. Its a tough choice remaining between the likes of Rhodes and all of the Wideouts

Round 1 Pick 14

DeAndre Hopkins WR Clemson

0101Clemson1303_t300.jpg

Its hard for me to choose between Allen, Hopkins, Patterson, and Williams. I think any of them can contribute, but I really want that explosive deep threat more than anything in this draft. As proven in these playoffs and with Smitty plenty in the past, that type of player can help close games. This for me boils down to T-Will and Hopkins. DeAndre is more reliable and sure-handed imo.

Round 2

DJ Fluker OT/G Alabama

13:01:09-DJ_Fluker.jpg

Stout offensive lineman who would help out all of the guys that make up our crazy running attack.

*Note: Potential landing spot for my draft crush Quinton Patton, but he's not in these fake plans of mine

Round 4

Kwame Geathers DT Georgia

7_253823.jpg

Big mamma jamma that came out early with a ton of potential. Definitely woud go for him if available here.

Round 5

Ricky Wagner OT Wisconsin

1018137.jpg

Another OT for depth and from arguably the school that produces some of the best NFL linemen imo. He's a good one from a consistent system that creates damn good run blockers. If Wagner is not available, go with Uzzi of Georgia Tech at G.

Round 6

Terry Hawthorne CB Illinois

50a5b2eece6ff.preview-300.jpg

I think he rises up some boards but you never know. Its near damn impossible to project this far

Round 6 (c. pick)

Cameron Lawrence OLB Miss St.

Seems like a typical late round lb'r who has a lot of upside but is a hit or miss. Hard to judge but I think someone like him could be a good ST asset and decent for depth down the road. Late rounder so its a whatever type deal.

**Wrap-up:

-Get a big play, deep threat for Cam and this offense

-Solidify the o-line and look to it's future

-FAs -- FS please for the one decent pick-up, a cheap RB, and make sure we re-sign D'wan

-OC -- Hue Jackson, Hugh Jackman, or Ken Whisenhunt

32291.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont take it personally, but Numero Uno looks more like number 2... Not liking it that much. Not yet sold on Deondre Hopkins. I did like the opening credits though.

Don't worry, I don't take mock drafts seriously. No one should. They're silly and fun to do.

But Les, I am curious in hearing why you aren't sold on Hopkins. I'm in general just curious about this WR class. I think its a strong top-8 or so without a sure-fire stud in the class so there will definitely be stark differences in fan's opinions. I'm as interested in Cobi Hamilton and Quinton Patton as Justin Hunter and Robert Woods.

I just really really really freaking want a new offensive weapon on this team. It's long overdue and him and T'Will will be staring us in the face midst the big uglies in that first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess if this happened I would be forced to lean towards Rhodes, Jesse Williams, or Barrett Jones. Probably the Bama boys,games are won in the trenches.

I do agree about the game being won in the trenches but doesn't make it a necessity in the 1st round. I could very easily lean toward a Jesse Williams/Quinton Patton combo scenario but I'm just aching for a flashy WR. No doubt, Rhodes and Williams seem like 2 very formidable prospects for us in the 1st.

I just feel WR is our top priority especially if Warmack & Fisher are gone and Gross stays, which is not out of the equation even considering the cap situation.

On the other side, we developed a strong defense amidst injuries and proved we can get pressure even when we rotate Frank or Greg inside with D'Wan; or even with Kearse or Chandler coming in for a play or two. Certain players definitely proved their worth and we still have the same HC who will stand by the guys he helped bring in. People forget we had a CJ-Hardy-Dwan-Alexander package in a decent chunk later on this past season.

I really think the more important factor is closing out games on the offensive end for us. Better road graders for the read option and more weapons are needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry, I don't take mock drafts seriously. No one should. They're silly and fun to do.

But Les, I am curious in hearing why you aren't sold on Hopkins. I'm in general just curious about this WR class. I think its a strong top-8 or so without a sure-fire stud in the class so there will definitely be stark differences in fan's opinions. I'm as interested in Cobi Hamilton and Quinton Patton as Justin Hunter and Robert Woods.

I just really really really freaking want a new offensive weapon on this team. It's long overdue and him and T'Will will be staring us in the face midst the big uglies in that first round.

Like you, I enjoy these mock drafts and the discussion that follows.

Your perspective is sound and appreciate the desire for a new offensive weapon. I am just hesitant to grab a receiver at 14 because like you said, there is no sure fire stud in this crop. I just think that an OL/DL may be better for the team and will have an immediate impact. If we were picking later in the first I would be more comfortable going with Hopkins but at 14 I see it as a reach.

Also, keep in mind my opinions are mostly based on misinformation and blind ignorance so anything I say should be taken with a grain or two of salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like you, I enjoy these mock drafts and the discussion that follows.

Your perspective is sound and appreciate the desire for a new offensive weapon. I am just hesitant to grab a receiver at 14 because like you said, there is no sure fire stud in this crop. I just think that an OL/DL may be better for the team and will have an immediate impact. If we were picking later in the first I would be more comfortable going with Hopkins but at 14 I see it as a reach.

Also, keep in mind my opinions are mostly based on misinformation and blind ignorance so anything I say should be taken with a grain or two of salt.

Yeah, it's always nice to have a for sure immediate impact type guy in the first and thanks for the cool response. We're kinda all in the dark with Gettleman's upcoming tendencies so it will definitely be interesting to see how it plays out. I tend to think if a team has their board and really want that next guy not marked off, they take him regardless of the seemingly consensus expert rankings. Happened with Seattle for example when they shocked everyone with Irvin and even the Titans to a degree with Locker. The thing is its still really early.

Anyway, I think Fluker and Aboushi will both rise into the first. You've gotta imagine more than just 2 or so OTs will be taken in the top 32 or beyond before our 2nd rounder. There's definitely a ton of interesting directions we can take.

Going beyond the 1st, another 2nd rounder to think about would be this David Bakhtiari fellow. All I read about the guy is how consistent he was and how well groomed and well-rounded he is for the NFL. He came out early and doesn't warrant much hype coming from Colorado. I think he could definitely be a strong Gross replacement at LT if we don't go OT in the 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have seen little inclination that they are laying down on him, that I can agree with. I don't think we are going to ever see much in the way of unfiltered opinions in the public realm from his teammates because that's extremely rare and extremely toxic behavior.  It's certainly a positive thing that they support him but, again, that doesn't make a successful NFL starting QB. Playing well on Sunday's does.  That is what has been lacking to date. He is not playing well consistently enough to be considered an NFL starting QB. He has to improve there. Be more consistent. Be more decisive. Make correct decisions more frequently. 
    • That's fine but for every Kurt Warner there are 10 Tony Banks that don't find their spot because....it never really existed.  Jake Browning was on and off practice squad teams for years until he stuck in Cincy. In his limited action over the past two seasons, he has played well enough that the Bengals panic traded for 41 year old Joe Flacco. It's easy to point to outliers like Warner or Purdy or Tom Brady as players who fell through the cracks because....well, they are outliers. The statistics over the long term have never really borne out the argument that every QB is just waiting for their perfect spot and situation. Most of these guys bounce around the league and it just never really clicks anywhere or they become marginal backup QB's. I don't think that exactly an accident. It's tough to be a starting NFL QB and it's why the hunt every offseason is so frantic. There are just so few that do it at a high level. My guess is that a theoretical market for Bryce Young(today) is going to look a lot like that post Chicago Justin Fields market. Not a lot of interest and a late round pick value at the highest. And a lot of that IS going to be his average to below average physical traits. It's extremely tough to be in that range and excel in the NFL. And it's precisely because you DO have to be closer to perfection to make up for the fact that you can't do a lot of the things that the elite to above average starters in this league do. 
    • Im never not impressed by how confidently wrong you are. I've watched probably 200 NFL QBs play live. This talk about Bryce's arm strength is retarded, pure and simple. Bryce can make every throw an NFL QB needs to make in any circumstance. Does he have an arm that makes you go wow all the time? No, but very few QBs truly do. Bryce has plenty of zip on the ball when he wants. That TD to XL was a frozen rope. He throws to the opposite hash and outside all the time with no problem. Bryce's arm is objectively stronger than Cam's post-injury. I've seen both live multiple times and I know. And Cam could still play QB well without his rocket launcher. OPs point remains. QB success relies on a lot of nebulous things. Obviously you dont like Bryce. But his success is not going to be bc he doesn't have the arm strength. Its embarrassing this is a thing. Go to some games and actually educate yourself.  
×
×
  • Create New...