Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Remember guys, Rome wasn't built in a day


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

I mean yea the 49ers were perennial losers for years up until Harbaugh showed up to town but they are extremely lucky and the only thing that separates us from them is that they've been lucky all the time and we haven't I mean Ron's no less competent than Harbaugh y'all. You guys need to remember winning takes time.

Go get em in 2029, Ron Rivera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were they 2-14 the year before he got there?? I thought they were 6-10, about where we are now.

Harbaugh is a great coach though. No doubt about it.

it took them 8 years after going 2-14 in 2004 to get where they are now.

6-10 with 4 of those wins coming from the then ultra competitive NFC West division which was eventually won by the 7-9 Seattle Seahawks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2029... lol.

I know Ron has had a few too many fail moments, but he still has improved this team every year.

It has only been 2 years since we were 2-14 with Pickles. This is his first gig, and I am seeing improvement.

I know people are also mad about Shula, but I think it may be a blessing in disguise. You dont fix what is not broken, our offense has potential to operate at a very high level, and we are having success with the passing and running game. The playbook isnt so much the problem as the wrong playcalls at the wrong time were.

The defense is also still improving. Our Pass rush is getting into beast mode, and our linebackers are swarming to the ball, even with Beason on the sidelines.

Oh there's that "but" word again we always see when we're trying to follow up an objective Ron observation with a token positive. I don't see any buts in SF because they improve in increments of playoff berths and superbowl berths, not one game per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh there's that "but" word again we always see when we're trying to follow up an objective Ron observation with a token positive. I don't see any buts in SF because they improve in increments of playoff berths and superbowl berths, not one game per year.

I missed you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sucks really. Every year we have some hope for the next season and every year we're let down. There isn't much hope going into next season. When you look at history, this will be Rivera's last year as he'll get fired. Then we start all over with a new staff. Then we have to wait even more years during the "rebuilding phase". Probably won't be good again until 2016 at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6-10 with 4 of those wins coming from the then ultra competitive NFC West division which was eventually won by the 7-9 Seattle Seahawks

Well, we played in a division where the second best team only had a 7-9 record and only got 3 wins in our division.

So maybe not as bad as that conference, but close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bruce Arians said when evaluating a college prospect they have to win on 3rd down and in the 2 min drill to be successful in the nfl.
    • We took Luke when we had Jon Beason, and a hurt Jonathon Brooks when we had Chuba. Just noting.  I don't think teams are going to pass up on an impact player regardlessly if whether they need something else. There's a good argument that drafting an inferior player, and especially an obviously inferior player, based upon need is a pathway to failure.  I'm glad we took Tetairoa McMillan even though there were arguably bigger needs.
    • As much as I'd love Cam or Mahomes I'd also settle for a QB that is at least better than average at something other than 4th quarter comebacks/game winning drives. He's literally bottom third in the league in most categories (yards, completion percentage, int percentage/turnovers, YPA, IAYPA, QBR and QB rating) and right around average in a couple others, notably TD % where he is 15th and YAC/PA where he is 9th. If Bryce can improve I'll be happy with him. But all this stuff about us asking for perfection / insane ability is a bit ridiculous. Most of us "haters" just see a QB that is basically below average over his career to date and has shown relatively little consistency in his third year.  NFL offenses don't need 400 yards every week at all, but they do require a QB that can move the ball, and Bryce struggles often with that (hence why our overall offensive rank is so bad despite an overall good rushing rank).
×
×
  • Create New...