Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Huddle mock offseason sign up/depth chart thread.

DaCityKats

By DaCityKats,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TylerVagyler Newbie

TylerVagyler

Posted
Posted

would you rather have it a unlimited # of releases? and just use rotoworlds free agent list?

I was taking a shot at you or anything. You do a great job setting this up. It's just hard to make moves when your top 5 FAs are automatically gone.

It would probably be way too confusing but I think it'd be cool to have a 2-3 day period for guys to look at their rosters and make restructures, cuts, and resigns. We could limit the number of restructures to make it realistic. This way, it's your fault if you lose a guy to FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaCityKats Newbie

DaCityKats

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I was taking a shot at you or anything. You do a great job setting this up. It's just hard to make moves when your top 5 FAs are automatically gone.

It would probably be way too confusing but I think it'd be cool to have a 2-3 day period for guys to look at their rosters and make restructures, cuts, and resigns. We could limit the number of restructures to make it realistic. This way, it's your fault if you lose a guy to FA.

i didnt take it as one,but restructures would also be very confusing.doing this way also dictates the way you draft and trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Munch4455 Newbie

Munch4455

Posted
Posted

I was taking a shot at you or anything. You do a great job setting this up. It's just hard to make moves when your top 5 FAs are automatically gone.

It would probably be way too confusing but I think it'd be cool to have a 2-3 day period for guys to look at their rosters and make restructures, cuts, and resigns. We could limit the number of restructures to make it realistic. This way, it's your fault if you lose a guy to FA.

How do you propose doing resigns/restructures that would be fair? Who's to say what a fair price would be for a player? You can't just say, "I resign X player for X amount" and poof it happens. At the end of the day you still have the edge over other teams on resigning your players due to the fact that you can bid more than them and still end up paying the same amount(hometown discount).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin Greene Newbie

Kevin Greene

Posted
Posted

How do you propose doing resigns/restructures that would be fair? Who's to say what a fair price would be for a player? You can't just say, "I resign X player for X amount" and poof it happens. At the end of the day you still have the edge over other teams on resigning your players due to the fact that you can bid more than them and still end up paying the same amount(hometown discount).

Actually Munch that isn't the case at all.

For instance your Bengals have $44 cap room, his Redskins zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Munch4455 Newbie

Munch4455

Posted
Posted

Actually Munch that isn't the case at all.

For instance your Bengals have $44 cap room, his Redskins zero.

Whats your point? No one forced him to join the league, no one forced him to pick the Redskins. We added the ability to cut players this year, thats more than you could do last year. This is supposed to be as realistic as possible, and that means making hard decisions on cuts if you want to resign some key players. And the fact of the matter is that there is no fair way to do restructures or resignings. Best way to do it is the way that Dacitykats came up with, and that is give a discount to teams that win the bidding for their own free agents.

Edit: Its also not like he is losing any key players. Losing a FB, a TE coming off ACL injury, Second string OLB, mediocre guard, and a aging saftey. If he REALLY wants to keep those guys he could cut Deangelo Hall, Barry Cofield, Trent Williams or others to have the money to keep those free agents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted

SD CHARGERS Depth Chart.

Offense

QB - Phillip Rivers Charlie Whitehurst

RB - Ryan Matthews Ronnie Brown Jackie Battle

FB - Le'Ron McClain

WR - Malcom Floyd Robert Meachem

WR - Eddie Royal Golden Tate Mike Willie

TE - Antonio Gates Randy McMicheal Ladarius Green

LT - Jordan Gross Mike Harris Jared Gaither

LG - Tyronne Green Steve Schilling

C - Nick Hardwick David Molk

RG - Rex Hadnot Steve Schilling

RT - Lane Johnson Jeromey Clare Kevin Haslam

Defense

LDE - Corey Liguet Vaughn Martin

NT - Cam Thomas

RDE - Kendell Reyes

LOLB - Tamba Hali Antawn Barnes Larry English

LILB - Stewart Bradley Jonas Mouton

RILB - Donald Butler Dermorrio Williams

ROLB - Jarret Johnson Melvin Ingram Sergio Kindle

CB - Quinton Jammer Marcus Gilchrist Greg Gaston

CB - Marcus Trufant Shareece Wright Chris Carr

FS - Eric Weedle Darrell Stuckey

SS - Atari Bigby Corey Lynch

Special Teams

K - Nick Novak

P - Mike Scrifes

LS - Kyle Nelson

KR - Chris Carr

PR - Eddie Royal

Draft Picks -

1st round - Lane Johnson, OT

4th round (13th pick)

4th round (via Seattle)

5th round (12th pick)

6th round (11th pick)

7th round (15th pick)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...