Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Women Are Nasty, Too


LifeisaGarden

Recommended Posts

My long time best friend sent this to me. I must say, I can't agree more. Not all women are like this though.

"Women Are Nasty, Too

by AppleBiter ©

Okay, gentlemen, I just want to share with you some common myths about women that really get under my skin. I'm not saying that these statements don't apply to some women out there (I'm sure they do), but they are not a blanket statement, encompassing all women, and I just want to set the record straight, once and for all. I'm tired of society misunderstanding women's sexuality. Get ready for a rant.

Myth #1: Women aren't visually stimulated. Bullshit. Looking at my man when he pulls his jeans down, and he's hard, and I can see a perfect outline of his cock through his black Hanes boxer briefs, down to the groove around the head, I get soaked. Looking up at his tanned chest starting to get flushed, and his brown nipples getting stiff – that alone nearly drives me to orgasm. And, when I see his hand start to travel down his chest, over his abdomen, down to his, Oh God. Don't get me started. I believe this myth is the sole reason why there are practically NO porn sites out there for women!! I want to see some naked men, damn it!! No offense to my gay friends out there (I love ya dearly), but I don't want to have to resort to looking at a gay male site just to find some hot, naked guys! I want a site for straight women wanting to ogle at and drool over straight, hot, naked guys. Can I get an "Amen", ladies??!!

Myth #2: Women don't like hardcore porn. Bullshit. Just like any guy out there, I want to see some hardcore fugin'. Not any of this namby-pamby pseudo-sex bullshit, but some real, cock-in-*****, sucking, licking, fuging, cum spewing hardcore nasty sex. I don't want simulated sex between two people wearing flesh-colored thongs where all I can see is the woman's entire body, and the man's chest and maybe his ass. What a rip-off. Give me hardcore porn any day.

Myth #3: Women are inherently all bisexual, some just may not know it yet. Dream on, boys. Learn to differentiate between fantasy and reality. The reality is, some women are lesbians, some are bi, and some are straight, just like with men. We are not, I repeat NOT all bisexual. I, for one, am straight. I love men, but women do nothing for me. I am not repressed, I am well aware of my preferences and I like men, period. *(pointing at self)* Loves the cock.

Myth #4: Women don't like hardcore erotica, it has to be romantic, subtle, and insinuative, with a plot that they can get lost in. Bull poo. I've even seen some online e-zines go so far as to warn writers that their audience is "mostly women", so they needed something "tasteful" and not "smut." I love smut. In fact, if something has too much of a plot, I'm liable to skip most of the story, just to get to the good part. And, if (in the good part), I'm met with insinuations and euphemisms, I'm completely put off. I won't read one more word. They've killed my happy time. I don't want read about his "aching loins". I want to read about his "hot, throbbing cock dripping with pre-cum." I realize it's all a matter of taste, and as I said, I'm sure there are women who fit the description that I wrote above. But, I also know I'm not alone and there are women out there with tastes just like mine that are being all but ignored.

Myth #5: Women don't think about sex as much as men. Oh, hell yes, some of them do. And I would venture to bet that some of them could give you boys a run for your money. It's just that when women admit to thinking about sex a LOT, they get labeled a "pervert." Don't ask me why this is, I've never understood double standards. But, it is what it is and many women don't feel comfortable admitting how much they think about sex or some of the raunchy things that turn them on because other people (especially other women) judge them and try to make them feel wrong about it. It makes women uncomfortable to think that they are some oversexed, perverted nymphomaniac if they admit to and embrace some of the things I mentioned above. For those women, I want to say that you are not alone and there is nothing wrong with you. Women have just been censoring themselves for far too long. Embrace your inner freak, girl!

For the guys: I hope this has been an eye-opener for some of you and I hope you will take this information to heart. Like I said, it doesn't apply to all women, but I think it's important to know that there are a variety of women out there with different tastes and we are not all delicate flowers. We don't all like to make sweet, gentle love. Some of us want a hard fuging. We don't all want to cuddle. Some of us want to rest for a minute, then climb right back on."

http://www.literotica.com/s/women-are-nasty-too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • overall agree on the draft grade as a whole on on each pick, but every time I read (and I have read it more than once) that we "gave up two firsts" for Bryce, I am confused. We gave up the 2024 first, but we swapped 2023 firsts, so we didn't give up anything there. We did give up our former first rounder in DJ, but I don't think thats what you mean as one of the "firsts" we gave up.
    • Didn't  see this posted (since 2023) but since folks have been posting that you can't judge a draft class for three years (a ridiculous take), I thought I'd post this to see what people thought about the 2023 draft. Unfortunately this may not be the most interesting class to do this with but I do quite like retrospective draft grades. Would appreciate other's takes on this (and other recent) draft classes.   1(1) - Bryce Young QB: I am a bigger Bryce Young apologist than most (maybe all). I like the kid. But there is no way around it: This was a terrible pick. If he had been picked in the 4th or even the 3rd round I would feel pretty good about it. But this was the first overall pick that we gave up two firsts, our best offensive player to get.  GRADE: C -    2(39) - Jonathan Mingo WR: not much to say here here. He was here for two years. His yards per catch are on par with Bryce's yards per pass. Rough stuff. To date he has still never scored a touchdown in the NFL GRADE: F   3(80) - DJ Johnson OLB: a pick I hated as soon as it happened and an example of why the premise of this thread is honestly dumb. This was a bad pick when it happened. Most people knew it.  Then came training camp and he did not look good. Then came the preseason which confirmed what we saw in TC. Then came the season which confirmed what we saw in preseason. To date, he has half a sack in his career. GRADE: F 4 (114) Chandlers Zavala G: Honestly the best pick of this draft which really speaks to how awful this draft is. Other than Bryce, the only pick still on the team. He is mostly average or below average depth which in round 4 is not terrible. But he had a pff score of 43.5 and though I think people have unrealistic expectations for draft picks, I still would want a little more from a fourth round pick GRADE: C+   5 (145) - Jammie Robinson S: I liked the pick when it happened but ended up being a disappointment. He logged 1 tackle with the falcons last year and not enough snaps to get a grade on PFF.  GRADE: F OVERALL DRAFT GRADE: F  
    • You gonna make me post Stank before every game?  I kid, I kid. 
×
×
  • Create New...