Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Madden ratings are out

John Fox

By John Fox,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Brandon Newbie

Brandon

Posted
Posted

Moose, CJ, Brayton, Diggs, Gamble, Harris and Godfrey I can't agree with AT ALL. Moose while not fast is still a damn good receiver, CJ and Brayton are much more solid than a 68, not to mention Diggs? Seriously? Our secondary got the worst of it though, and hell Sherrod Martin isn't even in the right position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scpanther22 Experienced

scpanther22

Posted
Posted

Moose, CJ, Brayton, Diggs, Gamble, Harris and Godfrey I can't agree with AT ALL. Moose while not fast is still a damn good receiver, CJ and Brayton are much more solid than a 68, not to mention Diggs? Seriously? Our secondary got the worst of it though, and hell Sherrod Martin isn't even in the right position.

lol i agree but i almost never even play diggs...i just move connor over and his rateings go up and i play him..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thunderraiden Veteran

thunderraiden

Posted
Posted

i hope they at least make some more realistic playbooks more team specfic.

Now thats an idea... put up you're teams playbook on madden, then even all the kids can know what plays you're going to use...:rolleyes5:

on a side note: why do all the interesting madden things JUST about the panthers have to be moved to Zods fantasy land, i could see things that didnt have to do with the panthers, but when its a video showcasing new gameplay with rookies that haven't seen action yet or set-ups (gamble and marshall) why would you bury here?

Zod's fantasy land.. where post go to die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scpanther22 Experienced

scpanther22

Posted
Posted

Now thats an idea... put up you're teams playbook on madden, then even all the kids can know what plays you're going to use...:rolleyes5:

on a side note: why do all the interesting madden things JUST about the panthers have to be moved to Zods fantasy land, i could see things that didnt have to do with the panthers, but when its a video showcasing new gameplay with rookies that haven't seen action yet or set-ups (gamble and marshall) why would you bury here?

Zod's fantasy land.. where post go to die.

MORE realistic...not all the way like most of our plays would be running and playaction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...