Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL as a tax exempt entity


Recommended Posts

This is a pretty good article on exactly how the NFL is classified

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2013/06/01/nfl-as-tax-exempt-less-than-meets-the-eye/

 

 

Essentially 501©(6) organizations are not charities, because their members are trying to make money.  The members, though, are trying to make money for themselves.  They don’t really have an interest in having the 501©(6) make money.  That is why it is not-for profit even though it is not a charity.

 

So if you take away the NFL's tax exempt status you don't generate any taxes because the NFL takes a loss every year

 

 

The NFL had expenses in excess of revenue of $77,628,857 for the year ended 3/31/2012 and $52,195,407 for the prior year.  Apparently, that is nothing new.  The liabilities of the NFL exceeded its assets by $316,642,454  at 3/31/2012.  Superficially, my reasoning would be that if the NFL was organized as an LLC, instead of as an exempt organization, the member teams would have had nearly a third of a billion more in deductions since inception.  I’m sure it is more complicated than that, but I suspect that the motivation for the way it operaties may be to keep liabilities off the balance sheets of the member organizations.  It appears to me that if there is a game there, it is a GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) game, not a tax game.
 
Superficially, it appears that, if the NFL were not an exempt organization, it would not owe federal income taxes, because it has not been making money.  If you view the NFL in conjunctions with its member teams, it appears that it has the effect of increasing aggregate taxable income.

 

 

If this is all true then why the hell are lawmakers so hellbent on changing the status?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any good business owner knows for tax reasons you either want to show your company either breaking even or taking a loss every year, if you make money and show that you do you have to pay taxes on it and the US has among the highest coprate tax rates in the world so go figure they try not to pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is the NFL fiscally irresponsible?

 

i didnt say they were or weren't im just speaking from the mind of a politician.[i used bad wording i know, devils advocate]

 

from my understanding, NFL teams combine revenue and distribute it, much in a socialism fashion.

 

Kinda like the NBA floats the WNBA while the WNBA loses money year after year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that its even a discussion whether or not its right or wrong for a sports organization to pay taxes speaks volumes about how screwed up the system is.  Our tax code is over 76,000 pages long.  That makes a new york city phone book look like a Readers Digest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that its even a discussion whether or not its right or wrong for a sports organization to pay taxes speaks volumes about how screwed up the system is.  Our tax code is over 76,000 pages long.  That makes a new york city phone book look like a Readers Digest.

it's about economic impact, when apple sales products the only people making money is apple. when the NFL has a game, there are 70+thousand people showing up to games, and spend money on travel, food, merch ect.. and for fans of the away team, it drives up restaurant revenue in those cities, not to mention a great deal of the revenue generated by the franchises are paid to their players who while making millions are taxed at very high rates and pay millions in taxes, the NFL is a money making machine, if the NFL were to pull out of a city, the lost tax revenue might get close to $100m a year to that city (well maybe not just the city because there is a fair amount that goes to the feds but you get the point).

 

that why when the Panthers were asking for $200 million for upgrades I was saying all they were really asking for was the equivalent of a 2 year tax break from the city and state government.

 

it's called market size and market impact, if people actually knew how some of this stuff actually worked it would be amazing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's about economic impact, when apple sales products the only people making money is apple. when the NFL has a game, there are 70+thousand people showing up to games, and spend money on travel, food, merch ect.. and for fans of the away team, it drives up restaurant revenue in those cities, not to mention a great deal of the revenue generated by the franchises are paid to their players who while making millions are taxed at very high rates and pay millions in taxes, the NFL is a money making machine, if the NFL were to pull out of a city, the lost tax revenue might get close to $100m a year to that city (well maybe not just the city because there is a fair amount that goes to the feds but you get the point).

that why when the Panthers were asking for $200 million for upgrades I was saying all they were really asking for was the equivalent of a 2 year tax break from the city and state government.

it's called market size and market impact, if people actually knew how some of this stuff actually worked it would be amazing

You may have misinterpreted my post a bit. I get all that and I too was one of the few that supported the team getting the money. The loss far outweighed any small increases that may incur. I was trying to say that people are discussing the wrong things nowadays. The tax status of the NFL should not be a focus of discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To all the analysts who said "Caps in 5", thank you for telling us their departure time.
    • We won't know the answer to this for a long time. Reality is, Caleb has been the consensus #1 in that draft for years. Bryce was a similar situation, but mostly the same. He was not the clear and obvious #1 that Caleb was, but most teams had Bryce at QB1. The Panthers were always going to be terrible Bryce's rookie year.  I don't think DJ Moore's presence would have changed anything about that offense, as our guards, center, and left tackle were getting demolished on nearly every snap. It's clear Caleb's dad was trying to do everything possible to ensure Caleb didn't end up in Chicago with Eberflus. It's hard to imagine that he wouldn't have done the same, but probably more publicly with our situation, considering Carolina is an easier target for the media than Chicago. We can all speculate, but it's impossible to tell who is going to have the better career on May 16, 2025. If either QB doesn't pan out, we have an easy answer. If both flame out, the bears clearly won the trade, but it wouldn't have really mattered anyway. We all know how we win the trade. Candidly, even if one of the other picks we gave up ends up being a hall of fame player, we don't know if the panthers would have taken that player anyway. All you can do is make the best decision you can in the moment with the information you have. I really like Bryce Young, and I'm glad he's a Carolina Panther.  The only way to win in the modern NFL is to have an absolute dude at QB. I personally am happy that our franchise recognizes this, as I remember times when they did not. 
×
×
  • Create New...