Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is the MLB position dying out?


tarheelpride

Recommended Posts

Ran across an article talking about why MLB's are on their way out.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/john_lopez/06/30/linebackers/index.html

What are ya'lls thoughts, especially with us having Beason in the middle? i think we got a rare player in the middle and it'll only help us in the future.

It's true to a degree, as more teams switch to the 3-4 ILB's take over. One dominate defender hawking the middle is gone. For the few teams with base 4-3's though that middle defender has to be gold...like Jon Beason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...he did have the following to say:

That's not to say there is no place for fierce players like San Francisco's Willis, Houston's Ryans or Carolina's Jon Beason. Teams still must stop the run in order to be successful. And middle linebackers have evolved as well, becoming faster and better in pass coverage without losing tackling punch. But those kinds of talents are rare.

Regardless, I'm not too concerned about John P. Lopez's opinion on the evolution of pro defenses. The day that the middle linebacker position "dies out" is the day that NFL defenses decide that tackling isn't important and/or NFL offenses decide to stop running the ball.

Anyone else want to take up the argument that MLBs are "a dying breed"?

Who the eff is John P. Lopez anyway? Never heard of the guy. Apparently he used to write for the Houston Chronicle and has a radio show in Houston. He has two articles on SI.com. This one, and one about how Mario Williams proved to be a better draft pick than Reggie Bush or Vince Young (thanks for insight, champ). This guy isn't off to a good start at SI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was shocked when in the article he didn't mention beason as being among the top 5 MLB's today

The pictures that are linked from the article show him saying...

He has great instincts, is a big-time finisher at the point of impact and is athletic enough to drop into coverage. And he's just getting started. It's a race between Beason, Patrick Willis and DeMeco Ryans to earn the title of best middle linebacker in the game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ran across an article talking about why MLB's are on their way out.

I didn't interpret the article at all as saying MLB's are on their way out. I garnered from it that the position is evolving from the chase and smash MLB position of old, see their examples of such: Nitzchke, Singletary, Lewis, Butkus, Lambert, Seau, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More teams switch to the 3-4, the best MLB players are picked up by the 4-3 teams. Teams adapt to the 3-4, the 4-3 teams with the best MLBs excel, teams start shifting back to the 4-3. Reverse, rince, repeat.

Things change, but things stay the same.

So it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to ask a question to those more knowledgeable on the subject. What exactly is the difference between an ILB like Patrick Willis or Ray Lewis, and a MLB(4-3) like Jon Beason? I know the difference between schemes but I hear from alot of people that MLB(3-4) and MLB(4-3) are different positions.

Im guessing a 3-4 ILB has more responsibility to stop the run compared to a 4-3 MLB, which maybe why Patrick has so many tackles.

Does a 4-3 MLB have a more commanding role of the defense? Is he more responsible for reading the offense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...