Tiebreaker Panthers vs. Saints

[beastson]

This is if our records end up identical. Unless we beat the Saints twice. Assuming we split 1-1

 

 

1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).

 

1-1

 

2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.

 

Here's to sweeping the Falcons, that's a MUST WIN GAME. MUST WIN

 

 

3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.

 

This is where it gets interesting. Saints beat the Bills, Cardinals... teams we lost to. We beat the Patriots, a team Saints lost to. Jets - MUST WIN. Why? Cause the Saints lost to the Jets. Here's hoping the Saints lost to the Seahawks, cause we lost to the Seahawks. We need the Saints to lose to Seahawks. And/or the Rams. It would be amazing to lose to both. We got it if that happens and we split 1-1

 

4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.

 

This right here if it comes down to this is the KILLER. These fugers are undefeated vs NFC so far. If they lose tonight and we SPLIT with them, that would be only 2 losses against the NFC unless they lose to the Rams which would make 3 NFC losses(Panthers, Hawks, Rams) to our 3 losses(Saints, Hawks, Cards)... but if they do see 3 ^^^^

 

So realistically speaking here... its looking like we have to defeat them twice. And that sucks cause UNLIKE the NBA, the NFL don't reward the team with the best record HFA. There's nothing wrong with a wildcard. Its extremely possible to bulldozer to the SB it happens a lot. Just like... it's also possible to defeat them twice

[TheGreatestOfAllTimeCam]

Bottom line, they will not lose to the Rams, no matter what the Rams don't beat an organization like that. 0% chance.

[Ruff]

Bottom line, they will not lose to the Rams, no matter what the Rams don't beat an organization like that. 0% chance.

Any given Sunday.

[Doyle]

They lose to the Rams.  You heard it hear first.

[ajax4132]

Lets sweep the Saints and not have to worry about the numbers

[ajax4132]

Bottom line, they will not lose to the Rams, no matter what the Rams don't beat an organization like that. 0% chance.

 

Rams are dangerous, wouldn't be surprised if they beat them

[KJ89]

wtf is this 1-1 split bullshit. We sweeping the saints both times.

[Boltergeist]

Bottom line, they will not lose to the Rams, no matter what the Rams don't beat an organization like that. 0% chance.

 

Rams 31, Saints 21 - how quickly you forget. NO finished 13-3 that year, STL 2-14

[Montsta]

Thank you OP. This is phenomenal breakdown of the tiebreaker scenarios.

[camtheone]

Rams game I believe is on the road for them....Rams are no joke....solid team....very physical....could them losing that game also...which would be huge....or more like HUGE.....KEEP POUNDING!!!!!!

[megatroll]

Bottom line, they will not lose to the Rams, no matter what the Rams don't beat an organization like that. 0% chance.

the rams would crush the organization that is playing right now

 

[panthers04100]

Bottom line, they will not lose to the Rams, no matter what the Rams don't beat an organization like that. 0% chance.

they lost to the jets. I would say the rams are slightly better than the jets this year and the game is in st.louis

[Frank Hollywood]

I think you misinterpreted something.

If we split with the saints AND we beat the jets and falcons we win the division due to common games won.

[KendrickPanther]

Remember what Arnold said in the Predator. "It bleeds, if it bleeds then it can be killed". Geno Smith made the Saints bleed.