Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Kemba the long term answer at PG?


MichaelNewtonII

Recommended Posts

Been saying this for a while now. Love him as a person, like him as a player, but dont love him as one. Kemba is not the long term answer in my eyes. He score big at times, but he doesnt "create" or "open" up this offense. He's not a game changer. Kemba doesnt make players around him better, but himself only. As of right now, Raymond Felton is still the best PG to ever played for this franchise.

 

hyde-s-laugh-o.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he hasnt carried a team to 30 wins so he isnt carrying much

Sent from my SGH-T399 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

1) He's on his 3rd coach in his 3rd year in the league.

 

2) His best post player until this year was Byron Mullens.

 

Chris Paul, prime Deron Williams, Tony Parker, etc couldn't lead any team to 30 wins under those circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) He's on his 3rd coach in his 3rd year in the league.

2) His best post player until this year was Byron Mullens.

Chris Paul, prime Deron Williams, Tony Parker, etc couldn't lead any team to 30 wins under those circumstances.

Chris Paul could lead the bobcats to 40 wins

Sent from my SGH-T399 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second year Chris Paul with Mike Dunlap as his head coach and Byron Mullens as his #2 offensive option does not win 40 games.

at least 30. Mainly due to the fact Paul is better than kemba in literally every way possible, plus MAKES EVERY SINGLE PLAYER AROUND HIM BETTER. way better.

Sent from my SGH-T399 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's weird. Chris Paul didn't win 40 games, like you originally said, in his second year in the league....with David West and Tyson Chandler as his post options. In case you weren't aware, West and Chandler >>>>>>> Byron Mullens.

you never said a 2nd year chris paul originally, you said prime. And by the way tyson chandler was pure trash until his time in dallas and david west is not a dominant force he is better beside hibbert.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you never said a 2nd year chris paul originally, you said prime. And by the way tyson chandler was pure trash until his time in dallas and david west is not a dominant force he is better beside hibbert.

 

1) I said Chris Paul in the same circumstances (ie second year in the league, second head coach [Mike Dunlap]). I only said prime Deron Williams because he sucks now.

 

2) You aren't really arguing that a David West-Tyson Chandler combo is as bad as a Byron Mullens-Bismack Biyombo combo are you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...