Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A site that may interest some of you draftniks.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

The site is optimumscouting.com. I came across it last year while researching prospects. I think that it is good for ranking purposes (or trying to get a good list of viable prospects at each position), but if you're looking for profiles and all that, you may have to go elsewhere (though it does have some articles pertaining to some of the draft prospects and players in the NFL right now). One thing I like about it is that it does have its 2012 and 2013 rankings as well, so that you can see how they actually did on their prognostications).   I use this site and walterfootball.com as kind of a beginning point to know the nation's top prosepcts at each position. 

 

I am a relative newcomer to this amateur (fan) draft research business, and am somewhat conflicted about spending time and effort into something that I really don't fundamentally enjoy (but find entertaining only as it relates to the Panthers) and have no control over. That being said, it's fairly interesting.

 

If you get a chance and are inclined, I am curious to know what you think of the site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The site is optimumscouting.com. I came across it last year while researching prospects. I think that it is good for ranking purposes (or trying to get a good list of viable prospects at each position), but if you're looking for profiles and all that, you may have to go elsewhere (though it does have some articles pertaining to prospects and players in the NFL right now). One thing I like about it is that it does have its 2012 and 2013 rankings as well, so that you can see how they actually did on their prognostications).   I use this site and walterfootball.com as kind of a beginning point to know the nation's top prosepcts at each position. 

 

I am a relative newcomer to this amateur (fan) draft research business, and am somewhat conflicted about spending time and effort into something that I really don't fundamentally enjoy---but find entertaining only as it relates to the Panthers---and have no control over. That being said, it's fairly interesting.

 

If you get a chance and are inclined, I am curious to know what you think of the site.

 

Thanks for the heads up. I checked it out and added it to my favorites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...