Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornet logo's that have been rejected

Jakob

By Jakob,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
Posted

Bring Back the Buzz dumping pictures of Hornets art concepts that I could only imagine are ones rejected by the Bobcats considering the images don't exist anywhere else on the web.. 

 

ACTCl5P.jpg

KrOYrdG.jpgQ3gEbTT.jpg

Ag3QT1c.jpgAkO36UI.jpg

 

I know we have a thread about this but, I wanted to make a new one I can update with actual logos that have been rejected... Some of these are terrible. Whoever made the last one is bad and should feel bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I know at least the first one is fan made and has been posted in a another thread.   Personally I don't think the 2nd and 4th one are that bad and keep the old hugo but is slightly more modern and aggressive.

 

Is that the new logo?

I'm pretty sure the logo will be just like the original hugo, just more modern and stronger looking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You obviously can't read, OP.

Their Facebook says these are all concepts created by fans. They have nothing to do with rejected designs or the team in any way

Let me tell you a secret.. I can't read something if I didn't know it existed.

 

I said "Bring Back the Buzz is dumping pictures of Hornets art concepts that I could only imagine are ones rejected by the Bobcats considering the images don't exist anywhere else on the web."

 

All fans are able to send in art concepts. You said, "Their Facebook says these are all concepts created by fans" I said "Bring Back the Buzz is dumping pictures of Hornets art concepts"

 

I didn't confirm it was logo's declined by the team, I just didn't know where they were coming from. Any fan can send in an Art Concept and a logo has already been chosen so obviously these have been rejected. 

 

Who really can't read?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jakob Newbie

Jakob

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You said Bring Back The Buzz posted them, I didn't even know what that was. I googled it and the first result was their Facebook.

If you don't know what you're posting maybe you shouldn't make a thread title "logos that have been rejected."

 

Where do you think I got them from? The Bring Back the Buzz facebook page.. Obviously if the Bobcats are not using these logos they have been rejected..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SCO96
      TE group

      By SCO96 · Posted

      What you are saying isn't always true and I'll give you several examples to demonstrate this. 1) The best player on the board at the end of in round 1 by all consensus is RB (top 15 player in draft who slips b/c of the devaluation of the RB position). Your team is in desperate need of a LT because the current one is getting your QB killed. You already have a serviceable RB in place. The LT has a 2nd round grade and you have the first pick on day 2 of the draft Who do you choose? 2) Your run defense was abysmal the previous season. A DT in round 2 does not provide much in terms of pass rush, but most reports have him rated as the best pure run stuffing DT in the draft. The two highest rated players on your board at the time are a TE and tweener at OLB/DE who slipped into round 2 after a run on WR's. Who do you choose? 3) Your pass rush rush is solid across the board. You even have guy coming off of the bench to provide production. Your secondary in below average. No Safety on the roster is a difference maker and as a unit the squad doesn't have an INT. The highest rated player on the board is a DE. The 5th highest rated player on the board is a an intelligent ball hawking Safety. Which player would make the team immediately better?  1) I think the BPA logic applies when your team is solid across the board and you can afford to draft for depth 2) I think it also applies when your team stinks and any solid player will be an immediate upgrade over what you already have. I agree that you should NEVER reach for a player when you are need at a position like we did for Bryce Young. But I also think if there's is a player on the board that will fill a glaring weakness you need to take him even if a player with a higher over all ranking is available at another position (which isn't a need)  
    • LinvilleGorge
      what does bryce young excel at

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Bryce Young excels at dividing Panthers fans. That seems to be what he's best at.
    • mrcompletely11
      what does bryce young excel at

      By mrcompletely11 · Posted

      184 yards game, 61% completion 11 tds 5ints    thats ranks :check notes:  25th in the nfl
×
×
  • Create New...