Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pat Kirwin says we don't need to change that much to win this week


panthers55

Recommended Posts

Of course I piss people off, silly. I do so when they say obviously ignorant things. You're a prejudiced buffoon and your posts reflect that so that's why I'm an asshole to you.

 

You know nothing about me.  I am a prejudiced person in the slightest....and people who know me know that. 

 

I just have this little weakness where I have to call out stupid people for being stupid....thus, why I just can't resist commenting on your posts as to just how ridiculously dumb you are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfair, to really even judge this class....Barner or Klien could become superstars and someone like Short could go all rogue and Otah-like.  Not suggesting I think that but you don't judge a draft class yet.

 

as for Hurn-dawg...he had his flaws but you are failing to give him credit.  2007 for example.

 

Beason - All Pro/Pro Bowler

Kalil, All Pro/Pro Bowler

Charles Johnson - Pro Bowler caliber

 

That was 3 homeruns in one draft.

 

 

Hurney had tons of flaws and I am glad he is now gone.  But too many try to totally discredit him when he did some good things.   DG is off to a good start....but while he did inherit a mess he also inherited some great players thanks to Hurney.

Hey, you are the one that downplays the effect Gman has had on this franchise. You said that Hurndog would have done some of the same things. No way to verify that. Hurney was not a football guy. He got by on sheer luck, and input from others. Gman gets by on knowledge, and input from others.

There is a huge difference between the two. I, an many others love the direction we are going. No way would Hurney have gotten us this far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here go a couple of posts down and see for yourself

My point is that the outrage from you is over me and "my demeanor" which I guess you consider to be more offensive than this for some reason. Calling people stupid is not worse than what madhatter does, even if it's you I'm doing it to, but you judge people subjectively, so here we are trying to put the idea forth that I'm worse.

 

The comment that you keep referencing (that I made) had to do with someone saying that we should now go to 9th ward in New Orleans and rebuild their neighborhood.  It is now 8 years later.  If the people living there have done nothing to try and rebuild their neighborhood in that amount of time, my concern for them is lessened....because I am not going to go do the work for them while they sit at home playing XBox.

 

There is nothing racist about that remark.  I would say the same thing about someone living in any neighborhood who had the same issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was, and still is an incredibly ignorant thing to say MadHatter.

Why? Because you don't think people should take any accountability or effort to improve their situation? Just wait long enough and others will do it for you

All it takes is a little effort and manual effort to pick up trash and debris. Yet, Taft poo us still everywhere there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Because you don't think people should take any accountability or effort to improve their situation? Just wait long enough and others will do it for you

 

It was an irresponsible generalization of all poor blacks in the low income areas of New Orleans.

 

There's no wiggling out of it. Honestly, we've disagreed on a lot of things, but you really need to make that right. It's a very bad look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was an irresponsible generalization of all poor blacks in the low income areas of New Orleans.

There's no wiggling out of it. Honestly, we've disagree on a lot of things, but you really need to make that right. It's a very bad look.

It was only meant at those living in areas that still look like poo. They can and should take done pride and put forth some effort to repair their neighborhood...not just wait on someone else to do it.

It is no way was meant as a shot at all poor people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry about that gif it's just that when the grand wizard of carolinahuddle tells you to shut up it's kind of pathetic

 

The more things change the more they stay the same.

 

Frash doing nothing but stinking up the joint with posts that have zero redeeming qualities...but is too stupid to realize it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...