Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Better chance of getting to the Superbowl No. 2 Seed


Ace_Aladdin

Recommended Posts

Not directly on topic, but I have been thinking about something. This year, I think the 2 seed in the NFC may have a BETTER chance than the one seed of getting to the Super Bowl. Both of the non-bye division winners (which are seeded 3 and 4, respectively) are substantially worse than the wild card teams (seeded 5 and 6). Unless both wild card teams win, we will be facing a division winner. Because of that fact, Seattle will most likely have to face a tougher team in the second round than we will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not directly on topic, but I have been thinking about something. This year, I think the 2 seed in the NFC may have a BETTER chance than the one seed of getting to the Super Bowl. Both of the non-bye division winners (which are seeded 3 and 4, respectively) are substantially worse than the wild card teams (seeded 5 and 6). Unless both wild card teams win, we will be facing a division winner. Because of that fact, Seattle will most likely have to face a tougher team in the second round than we will.

 

I agree and it certainly is relevant to why the #2 seed in the NFC can be advantageous this post season.

 

As far as the SB is concerned................I really feel after 10 years we have unfinished business with NE after that loss in 2003.

 

So I'd like to see the Cats and Pats in the SB.

 

On the AFC side I think the Broncos are going to be tough to push out though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...