Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 Bold Predictions


Camsfanclub

Recommended Posts

This is the best prediction because it's the only one that matters.

 

Sidenote: I am reading some of the predictions and I am wondering if any of you ever really watched the Play-offs with some of those scores you're throwing up. 

 

16 of the best from the season get into the Play-offs with one change to move on and hopefully play hard enough and win their way into the SB. That usually means both sides of those teams show up. You rarely have blow out games. 

 

There clearly wasn't any last weekend and none I can think of off the top of my head in the past three or four plays-off seasons.

 

2012

 

GB 24-10 over Minny or Ravens 24-9 over Colts. SF over GB could be added, ass could NE's divisional win. 

 

2011

 

NY 24-2 over Atlanta, NY 37-20 over GB. NE 45-10 over Denver, Houston 31-10 over Cinci

 

2010

 

Ravens 30-7 over KC, GB 48-21 over Atlanta.

 

 

Last year's games are iffy, but the rest of these are blowout central. 

 

The thread is also called bold predictions.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the best prediction because it's the only one that matters.

 

Sidenote: I am reading some of the predictions and I am wondering if any of you ever really watched the Play-offs with some of those scores you're throwing up. 

 

16 of the best from the season get into the Play-offs with one change to move on and hopefully play hard enough and win their way into the SB. That usually means both sides of those teams show up. You rarely have blow out games. 

 

There clearly wasn't any last weekend and none I can think of off the top of my head in the past three or four plays-off seasons.

 

16?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I GUESS this doesn't happen MUCH with QBS in the NFL. And so exaggerative aren't we? Is this what you tell yourself so it will justify you demanding more out of him while hoping and praying the hodge-podge of players your team gave him to work with for the three seasons show up on Sunday? I wonder how much of a big deal the Colts fans are making over ALL of Luck's "HORRIBLE" throws and those three INTS on Saturday? It's clear the media isn't making much of about them. The same goes to Rivers and Colin.

 

Some of you honestly have some real issues. There is no doubt abut it. I honestly believe there is more hate for Cam in this fan base than outside of it. What gives?

 

You folks are not only underserving of him but kit now seems that no matter what Cam does, you're looking for ways to act like there is nothing wrong really wrong with your team that a good" QB and coach can't fix. And please spare me the whole, "gee, we can't criticize Cam" BS. That is getting as tired and boring as the all the other isn some of you been saying to defend your immaturity and arrogance while trying to hide your true colors behind. 

 

Some of you are nothing more than shallow football watchers. Always second guessing, assuming and blame shifting;

 while jumping on and off of any player's bandwagon whose name isn't Smitty or Luke. 

 

Here's a bold prediction: Cam helps take this team to the SB and your shallow behind sit and act like Mike "fake behind" Mayock at the Combines with Cam. Oh wait, that isn't a prediction. It's been happening for the past three seasons. Never mind!

you are talking to one of the originals that wanted Cam here in the first place. so shut your hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...