Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

While Newton struggles against top passing defenses, Kaepernick is worse


panthers55

Recommended Posts

& I'm the douche. Lol.  MMm, Don't be such a prissy panther, philly. 

Back to Topic.

 

Cam Is Good & He has improved dramatically this year with shula as OC.

 

You do realize you don't know what the hell your talking about right?

 

 

Its like we are all talking football, and you keep screaming PEACHES.

 

 

That's how far you are off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Isnt this Cam's 3rd year as a fulltime starter? How good was he during his first full year as a starter against those defenses? He probably got better eh? 

 

I find it humorous you think the 49ers are not a good road team at all, when my most talking heads consider them the best road team in the nfl.  THey went 7-2 this year so far. 8-1 if a call gets called correctly. And though its just 2 games, the 49ers and Kaepernick are undefeated on the road in the playoffs. But It isnt Kaepernick vs the panthers, its 49ers vs panthers, and 49ers are a stout road team except in seattle for some reason.

 

  

The reality is that most talking heads don't do the time or energy to look beyond the surface.  For example everyone is gaga about the win over Green Bay yet Green Bay's defense is awful and they were even down defensive starters who were there most of the year. Against good defenses on the road this year he is 1-3 with a QBR of 33.  Awful.  The only game he won was Arizona and his QBR in that game was still 50.

 

Most of their road wins were against terrible teams with poor defenses.  That doesn't take away from the wins just points out that that kind of information is irrelevant to how things will go this Sunday playing one of the best defenses on the road where he has been historically awful this year.

 

Looking at playoff games from last year and saying because Kaepernick was good last year, it will translate to this year is ridiculous.  Anyone who knows football knows you can't compare one year to the next.  And while experience will help him, it won't necessarily help him more than it will to have Cam playing at home for example where his QBR is twice as high against good defenses as is it on the road.  BTW, Kaepernick's is poor at home and on the road.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what

some one asked what it has been like since Crabtree returned.

 

SF played 2 top 10 defenses....SF won both by a combined 5 pts.  In both games, they took the lead late in the 4th.  Those are called coin flip games.....means the other teams overall were evenly matched and realistcally could of gone either way.  Hence, why the other team was either ahead or tied with SF late in the 4th of both.d

 

SF isn't a dominant team against good defenses.  Sunday in Charlotte......they aren't favored/more likely to win in reality.  Just in the media/big picture mass betting environment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reality is that most talking heads don't do the time or energy to look beyond the surface.  For example everyone is gaga about the win over Green Bay yet Green Bay's defense is awful and they were even down defensive starters who were there most of the year. Against good defenses on the road this year he is 1-3 with a QBR of 33.  Awful.  The only game he won was Arizona and his QBR in that game was still 50.

 

Most of their road wins were against terrible teams with poor defenses.  That doesn't take away from the wins just points out that that kind of information is irrelevant to how things will go this Sunday playing one of the best defenses on the road where he has been historically awful this year.

 

Looking at playoff games from last year and saying because Kaepernick was good last year, it will translate to this year is ridiculous.  Anyone who knows football knows you can't compare one year to the next.  And while experience will help him, it won't necessarily help him more than it will to have Cam playing at home for example where his QBR is twice as high against good defenses as is it on the road.  BTW, Kaepernick's is poor at home and on the road.

Lambeau is Lambeau, the cold was an extra edge to GB. That's why Anaylsts make much more of it. & With Aaron back and all.

 

He's bad on the road and at home? What? what? He's just as good on the road, what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

some one asked what it has been like since Crabtree returned.

 

SF played 2 top 10 defenses....SF won both by a combined 5 pts.  In both games, they took the lead late in the 4th.  Those are called coin flip games.....means the other teams overall were evenly matched and realistcally could of gone either way.  Hence, why the other team was either ahead or tied with SF late in the 4th of both.

Seattle & Arizona, Division Rivals with alot on the line, you would expect them to be close, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lambeau is Lambeau, the cold was an extra edge to GB. That's why Anaylsts make much more of it. & With Aaron back and all.

 

He's bad on the road and at home? What? what? He's just as good on the road, what.

 

a bad Packers D is a bad Packers D......and Rodgers was one game back being out with a broken collarbone most of the year.  That wasn't the feared Aaron Rodgers.....and it a was bad D going in that got worse as the game went on b/c of injury (and they almost beat SF picking CK on his final drive).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a bad Packers D is a bad Packers D......and Rodgers was one game back being out with a broken collarbone most of the year.  That wasn't the feared Aaron Rodgers.....and it a was bad D going in that got worse as the game went on b/c of injury (and they almost beat SF picking CK on his final drive).

It Is Lambeau Packers D, They should have something on the team after playing them 3 times and losing 3 times in a row.

 

He's still Aaron Rodgers, You saw how he came back and willed the packers to win the game against Chicago. a 80-90% Aaron is better than a 110% Flynn. and you saw that. Disregarding the Calls the Refs let go, but i digress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...