Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

While Newton struggles against top passing defenses, Kaepernick is worse

panthers55

By panthers55,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted

& I'm the douche. Lol.  MMm, Don't be such a prissy panther, philly. 

Back to Topic.

 

Cam Is Good & He has improved dramatically this year with shula as OC.

 

You do realize you don't know what the hell your talking about right?

 

 

Its like we are all talking football, and you keep screaming PEACHES.

 

 

That's how far you are off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

 

 

Isnt this Cam's 3rd year as a fulltime starter? How good was he during his first full year as a starter against those defenses? He probably got better eh? 

 

I find it humorous you think the 49ers are not a good road team at all, when my most talking heads consider them the best road team in the nfl.  THey went 7-2 this year so far. 8-1 if a call gets called correctly. And though its just 2 games, the 49ers and Kaepernick are undefeated on the road in the playoffs. But It isnt Kaepernick vs the panthers, its 49ers vs panthers, and 49ers are a stout road team except in seattle for some reason.

 

  

The reality is that most talking heads don't do the time or energy to look beyond the surface.  For example everyone is gaga about the win over Green Bay yet Green Bay's defense is awful and they were even down defensive starters who were there most of the year. Against good defenses on the road this year he is 1-3 with a QBR of 33.  Awful.  The only game he won was Arizona and his QBR in that game was still 50.

 

Most of their road wins were against terrible teams with poor defenses.  That doesn't take away from the wins just points out that that kind of information is irrelevant to how things will go this Sunday playing one of the best defenses on the road where he has been historically awful this year.

 

Looking at playoff games from last year and saying because Kaepernick was good last year, it will translate to this year is ridiculous.  Anyone who knows football knows you can't compare one year to the next.  And while experience will help him, it won't necessarily help him more than it will to have Cam playing at home for example where his QBR is twice as high against good defenses as is it on the road.  BTW, Kaepernick's is poor at home and on the road.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

what

some one asked what it has been like since Crabtree returned.

 

SF played 2 top 10 defenses....SF won both by a combined 5 pts.  In both games, they took the lead late in the 4th.  Those are called coin flip games.....means the other teams overall were evenly matched and realistcally could of gone either way.  Hence, why the other team was either ahead or tied with SF late in the 4th of both.d

 

SF isn't a dominant team against good defenses.  Sunday in Charlotte......they aren't favored/more likely to win in reality.  Just in the media/big picture mass betting environment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
48ochoshogun Newbie

48ochoshogun

Posted
Posted

The reality is that most talking heads don't do the time or energy to look beyond the surface.  For example everyone is gaga about the win over Green Bay yet Green Bay's defense is awful and they were even down defensive starters who were there most of the year. Against good defenses on the road this year he is 1-3 with a QBR of 33.  Awful.  The only game he won was Arizona and his QBR in that game was still 50.

 

Most of their road wins were against terrible teams with poor defenses.  That doesn't take away from the wins just points out that that kind of information is irrelevant to how things will go this Sunday playing one of the best defenses on the road where he has been historically awful this year.

 

Looking at playoff games from last year and saying because Kaepernick was good last year, it will translate to this year is ridiculous.  Anyone who knows football knows you can't compare one year to the next.  And while experience will help him, it won't necessarily help him more than it will to have Cam playing at home for example where his QBR is twice as high against good defenses as is it on the road.  BTW, Kaepernick's is poor at home and on the road.

Lambeau is Lambeau, the cold was an extra edge to GB. That's why Anaylsts make much more of it. & With Aaron back and all.

 

He's bad on the road and at home? What? what? He's just as good on the road, what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
48ochoshogun Newbie

48ochoshogun

Posted
Posted

some one asked what it has been like since Crabtree returned.

 

SF played 2 top 10 defenses....SF won both by a combined 5 pts.  In both games, they took the lead late in the 4th.  Those are called coin flip games.....means the other teams overall were evenly matched and realistcally could of gone either way.  Hence, why the other team was either ahead or tied with SF late in the 4th of both.

Seattle & Arizona, Division Rivals with alot on the line, you would expect them to be close, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Lambeau is Lambeau, the cold was an extra edge to GB. That's why Anaylsts make much more of it. & With Aaron back and all.

 

He's bad on the road and at home? What? what? He's just as good on the road, what.

 

a bad Packers D is a bad Packers D......and Rodgers was one game back being out with a broken collarbone most of the year.  That wasn't the feared Aaron Rodgers.....and it a was bad D going in that got worse as the game went on b/c of injury (and they almost beat SF picking CK on his final drive).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
48ochoshogun Newbie

48ochoshogun

Posted
Posted

a bad Packers D is a bad Packers D......and Rodgers was one game back being out with a broken collarbone most of the year.  That wasn't the feared Aaron Rodgers.....and it a was bad D going in that got worse as the game went on b/c of injury (and they almost beat SF picking CK on his final drive).

It Is Lambeau Packers D, They should have something on the team after playing them 3 times and losing 3 times in a row.

 

He's still Aaron Rodgers, You saw how he came back and willed the packers to win the game against Chicago. a 80-90% Aaron is better than a 110% Flynn. and you saw that. Disregarding the Calls the Refs let go, but i digress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...