Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Manchester City vs Liverpool in BofA Stadium on August 2, 2014


SCP

Recommended Posts

This could be huge for North Carolina in general for possibly landing an MLS team.

 

I would prefer to see Man U play being a Red Devils fan since I was 15 but I'm going to go just to see all the guys (Kolo Toure, Stevie G, Agger, Leiva, Sturridge, Suarez, Aguero, Dzeko, Nasri, Yaya Toure, Villa, etc)...

 

It should be a great event, hopefully Charlotte shows out.

 

And for those that don't care... event committees like the Final Four and Super Bowl look at how cities perform during similar events... so if you want a Super Bowl in Charlotte in the future, I wouldn't be complaining about a soccer match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dark Knight

This could be huge for North Carolina in general for possibly landing an MLS team.

I would prefer to see Man U play being a Red Devils fan since I was 15 but I'm going to go just to see all the guys (Kolo Toure, Stevie G, Agger, Leiva, Sturridge, Suarez, Aguero, Dzeko, Nasri, Yaya Toure, Villa, etc)...

It should be a great event, hopefully Charlotte shows out.

And for those that don't care... event committees like the Final Four and Super Bowl look at how cities perform during similar events... so if you want a Super Bowl in Charlotte in the future, I wouldn't be complaining about a soccer match.

Charlotte will never host a Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charlotte will never host a Super Bowl.

 

People said the same thing about Indianapolis. 

 

Trust me, I've actually taken a Sports Event and Facilities class, I know these things... If Charlotte can showcase the city in a manner similar to the Super Bowl (The X Games would have been ideal), the Super Bowl committee will take notice if the city is persistent in trying to get the game to Charlotte. However, that also includes building the necessary amenities (extra hotels, restaurants, bars, tourists attractions) to make the city hospitable for a Super Bowl.

 

The stadium upgrades will also help as well. However stadiums like Levi's stadium, the new Vikings Stadium, and the new Falcons stadium will have precedence over Charlotte due to the overall newness and freshness of those stadiums (see MetLife: built in 2010 (newest stadium in the NFL). However, don't be surprised if you see Charlotte thrown in with some of those other cities once the full renovation is complete.

 

The Man City/Liverpool game will definitely help in showcasing Charlotte because you will get people to drive down from D.C. and Virginia plus people to drive up from South Carolina and Georgia to see the game. Not to mention that the RDU area (which is one of the best area's for youth soccer) will likely fill half of the stadium.

 

The point is that for anyone to right this game off as "stupid" is super misinformed or just doesn't understand about the concept of Sporting Events and how they help a community (see Indianapolis when they were able to host the Super Bowl).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dark Knight

People said the same thing about Indianapolis.

Trust me, I've actually taken a Sports Event and Facilities class, I know these things... If Charlotte can showcase the city in a manner similar to the Super Bowl (The X Games would have been ideal), the Super Bowl committee will take notice if the city is persistent in trying to get the game to Charlotte. However, that also includes building the necessary amenities (extra hotels, restaurants, bars, tourists attractions) to make the city hospitable for a Super Bowl.

The stadium upgrades will also help as well. However stadiums like Levi's stadium, the new Vikings Stadium, and the new Falcons stadium will have precedence over Charlotte due to the overall newness and freshness of those stadiums (see MetLife: built in 2010 (newest stadium in the NFL). However, don't be surprised if you see Charlotte thrown in with some of those other cities once the full renovation is complete.

The Man City/Liverpool game will definitely help in showcasing Charlotte because you will get people to drive down from D.C. and Virginia plus people to drive up from South Carolina and Georgia to see the game. Not to mention that the RDU area (which is one of the best area's for youth soccer) will likely fill half of the stadium.

The point is that for anyone to right this game off as "stupid" is super misinformed or just doesn't understand about the concept of Sporting Events and how they help a community (see Indianapolis when they were able to host the Super Bowl).

Stopped reading here, & began LOLing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stopped reading here, & began LOLing.

 

That's fine, you probably studied to be a computer engineer or something of that sorts as where I chose (am choosing) to pursue a career in sports (and that class I mentioned happened to be a class that is required). Not only that, but it was a very helpful class. I'm guessing you haven't had the opportunity to get a back ground tour of the Verizon Center (home of the Capital's, Wizards, and Hoyas), tour Camden Yards (home of the Orioles), or get a back ground tour of M&T Bank Stadium (home of the Ravens). All perks of that class...

 

I just figured I'd give you some background info on what I know, so you can understand that I'm not one of those posters that posts rumors or ideas that they try to make seem like rumors.

 

Everything in that above post is foundationally solid, whether you believe it or not is your choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Dark Knight

That's fine, you probably studied to be a computer engineer or something of that sorts as where I chose (am choosing) to pursue a career in sports (and that class I mentioned happened to be a class that is required). Not only that, but it was a very helpful class. I'm guessing you haven't had the opportunity to get a back ground tour the Verizon Center (home of the Capital's, Wizards, and Hoyas), tour Camden Yards (home of the Orioles), or get a back ground tour of M&T Bank Stadium (home of the Ravens). All perks of that class...

I received my MBA from Charlotte.

I've seen games at Bank of America Stadium (Panthers), Charlotte Coliseum (Hornets), & TWC Arena (Bobcats), Turner Field (Braves), Nationals Park (Nationals), Camden Yards (Orioles), Citizens Bank Park (Phillies), New Yankee Stadium (Yankees), Rogers Centre (Blue Jays), Jacob's Field (Indians), & AT&T Park (Giants).

I toured the Dean E Smith Center while at Roy Williams' basketball camp, New Yankee Stadium with my girlfriend while on vacation, & AT&T Park while visiting a friend who plays for the Giants.

What the fug is your point?

Walking around stadiums has absolutely nothing to do with the Super Bowl. The NFL has already stated numerous times that Charlotte does not have the resources to host a Super Bowl.

Neither does your choice of wasting time in college for a career path with little to no job opportunities.

Again, what is your point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
    • See you guys had me wrong the other day I'm not a blind homer I just like more than a game sample size, that and with Morrow at fault for 4 goals i wanted to see if they could adjust and if rod the dud would play Boom. Well we got the answer.
×
×
  • Create New...