Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How will this deep WR class impact the WR FA market?


jarhead

Recommended Posts

they'll be expecting a lot, but settling for a lot less.

 

like every year, there will be one or two who get giant deals right out of the gate by dumb and desperate teams who could have waited a week or two and saved 3 or 4 mil/year and there will be one or two who get really big deals with their original teams, but then the rest will likely have to wait until after the draft unless they settle for very moderate and cap friendly contracts and/or one year deals just so they don't have to play and lose the waiting game.

 

this draft elass is going to keep prices pretty  low. i mean we're not going to be getting guys like golden tate or whatever for the vet min, but for about $3-4mil we could get a very talented WR.

 

one thing i see happening is teams facing what we are with smitty.  "cap challenged" teams will look at their WRs with big contracts and try to figure out if the guy they have on their roster could be replaced by one or two cheaper players found in FA or the draft. i think we'll be shocked to see a couple more really good WRs hitting the market that are cap casualties.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they'll be expecting a lot, but settling for a lot less.

 

like every year, there will be one or two who get giant deals right out of the gate by dumb and desperate teams who could have waited a week or two and saved 3 or 4 mil/year and there will be one or two who get really big deals with their original teams, but then the rest will likely have to wait until after the draft unless they settle for very moderate and cap friendly contracts and/or one year deals just so they don't have to play and lose the waiting game.

 

this draft elass is going to keep prices pretty  low. i mean we're not going to be getting guys like golden tate or whatever for the vet min, but for about $3-4mil we could get a very talented WR.

 

one thing i see happening is teams facing what we are with smitty.  "cap challenged" teams will look at their WRs with big contracts and try to figure out if the guy they have on their roster could be replaced by one or two cheaper players found in FA or the draft. i think we'll be shocked to see a couple more really good WRs hitting the market that are cap casualties.

That is the way I see it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Economically speaking, you would think it could only hurt their value.

 

But I don't think it will make much of a difference because teams can't just assume they will get one of the WRs they want in the draft.  Having draft picks in general hurts the value of free agents, so I can't imagine they would have more of an impact this year than what it has been in past years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Economically speaking, you would think it could only hurt their value.

 

But I don't think it will make much of a difference because teams can't just assume they will get one of the WRs they want in the draft.  Having draft picks in general hurts the value of free agents, so I can't imagine they would have more of an impact this year than what it has been in past years.

i think the quantity of quality receivers in this draft can't help but influence the market more than it usually does.

 

in addition to that, while cap space has increased, there is still limited space in many teams and the FA market last year saw more players signing one year deals than is typical and those players will be hitting the market again. there's quite.  few things working against all FAs this year...but those players who are going to be affected most are those players who play a position that has a lot of talented players entering via the draft. i think that the top LT FAs will still be getting large contracts because they are such a rarity, but for RTs, OGs, DBs, WRs, and maybe even QBs will take more of a hit to their value this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on what the team is looking for.  If you want a known commodity and you're ready to make a Superbowl run (ahem...Panthers) you can go after a guy like Hakeem Nicks.  If you're willing to wait for a guy to develop, you draft a guy.  The deals the players get are merely the result of what teams are willing to spend.  Some players get lucky and get a huge deal because a team gets desperate, but I think more and more teams would rather risk a draft pick on a guy for cheap then to tie up a bunch of money in a guy who could get hurt or suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the trend to pay franchise qbs a crap  load of money all positions except left tackle and maybe elite pass rushers are trending down but with the glut of talent at WR in the draft this year is coming at a great time for us. Depending on what happens with Smitty we may be adding 4 or 5 guys easy.My guess would be we either re-sign Ginn or go after someone like Emanuel Sanders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the trend to pay franchise qbs a crap  load of money all positions except left tackle and maybe elite pass rushers are trending down but with the glut of talent at WR in the draft this year is coming at a great time for us. Depending on what happens with Smitty we may be adding 4 or 5 guys easy.My guess would be we either re-sign Ginn or go after someone like Emanuel Sanders. 

 

The Panthers REALLY need to re-sign Ted Ginn.  He's a very valuable role-player.  Especially given the rumors Steve Smith might be a cap-casualty.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers REALLY need to re-sign Ted Ginn.  He's a very valuable role-player.  Especially given the rumors Steve Smith might be a cap-casualty.  

 

 

Oh I agree I was just noting that Sanders is also a decent returner and receiver. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...