Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Interested In Eric Decker and Hakeem Nicks


carolina-chuck

Recommended Posts

I am not one to be a grammer cop.

However, as the above post illustrates, it is becoming more and more difficult to even determine what half of you are saying. Please take a little time when you post to use at least decent sentence structure and grammer. Remember that others are actually trying to read and understand what you are saying.

lol at you thinking i give a damn about what u can & cannot understand. That wasn't even for you & I'm not changing anything. In other words fug off...hope u can understand THAT.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol at you thinking i give a damn about what u can & cannot understand. That wasn't even for you & I'm not changing anything. In other words fug off...hope u can understand THAT.

 

So, you like sounding like an illiterate and uneducated idiot....fine with me.

 

And lastly.  Take a few Midol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright! Not only is Steve above evaluation now......he should also be the general manager?

Yeah, people need to get a grip

 

Not saying that, it just we have a weak recieving corp, losing smith would not help the cause. We need someone as good as him and another good reciever. Its obvious he will have to take less money or be gone. But if he gets gone and we only replace him, we are no better off. If ginn could have been depended on for the long ball, they would have been a great tandem pair of recievers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not saying that, it just we have a weak recieving corp, losing smith would not help the cause. We need someone as good as him and another good reciever. Its obvious he will have to take less money or be gone. But if he gets gone and we only replace him, we are no better off. If ginn could have been depended on for the long ball, they would have been a great tandem pair of recievers.  

 

If he is replaced with a younger player of his equal and nothing else than the team is certainly better off. He has at the very most two years left and needs to be replaced no matter what else happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So you are saying that your posts are the best grammer and spelling that you can muster.  

 

Your 3rd grade teacher should be so proud.  Because that is about the level that you are showing.   My third grade son can write better than anything you have posted.

 

Carry on.....and no, I don't want fries with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are saying that your posts are the best grammer and spelling that you can muster.

Your 3rd grade teacher should be so proud. Because that is about the level that you are showing. My third grade son can write better than anything you have posted.

Carry on.....and no, I don't want fries with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...