Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettleman Made Nicks an Offer, But Nicks Says, "It Wasn't The Right Situation."


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

So, let me re-phrase that.

 

"We're a team in transition this year."

 

Feel better?

 

We're not a team in transition, though, so why would he say that?

 

It's illogical.

 

"Hey we're the NFCS champions and we want you to fill our biggest hole but LOL WE'RE IN TRANSITION :D"

 

That makes no sense. 

 

More likely: "We're constrained by our salary cap in FA signings.  We've got a lot of holes, so we may not be able to offer you what you feel you're worth, because we have to address other needs, as well."  

 

This is NOT a bad team right now.  We're NOT rebuilding, we're NOT in transition.  We have big holes, but most of our losses are people we can and will replace, and it's totally illogical to tell one of those pieces that we're going to lose anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I say "I wanna lose games" anywhere in my post? Please, go back through it. Read it. Tell me how many times I mentioned I wanna lose games. I'm going to be waiting until next offseason, in case it troubles you too much.

What I said was Gettleman could obviously not be focused on winning this year. This is a year to move cap space, draft/play prospects, and get better for the future. If we win, we win. But it's going to come with bumps and bruises.

Not focusing on winning games is the same poo as wanting to lose games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a lot more likely... I actually think releasing Smith hurt us more here than helped us.

A lot of young wrs that has expressed interest in Carolina always listed Steve Smith as a reason. A lot of young players at the position idolized Smitty and wanted to learn from him. Take that away and well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, didn't see the next tweet.  Why would we "agree" it wasn't the best situation with him?  LOL...

 

We probably "agreed" it wasn't the best situation when we offered less money than he wanted in a long-term deal.

 

Wouldn't be surprised if it was a performance-laden contract that would have allowed Nicks to shine if he wanted and he got scared off a little by the lack of options other than him.

 

That sounds like a real possibility.

 

The full translation likely would have been that Gettleman didn't really want him that badly, and given that he'd be in a position to know (between his own personal experience and contact with his old friends at the Giants) it's very likely that a deal based heavily on incentives or simply a contract offer a lot less than what Nicks wanted could have been "agreeing it wasn't the best situation".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uhh nope.

 

sorry.

 

no GM would ever tell a player, "We're not looking to win this season."  That's not how any conversation would go.  The GM would be instantly fired.  Especially coming off a contender like we are.

 

It's certainly possible that is the feeling that Nicks got from the conversation if they talked about other FA targets.

 

But remember what we filled in last year and how we did.  So, I'm not terribly panicked just yet. Waiting for the draft.

 

If we draft RBs and DTs I'm going to kill someone, though.

 

The whole notion is pretty stupid.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow...  Full quotes from the blog, and my interpretation, although I've been informed this morning that I'm not allowed to have one, is that we made the larger offer (most likely what was reported yesterday at 4.5M), and yet, Nicks and Gettleman agreed he should go to the Colts...

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/2014/03/hakeem-nicks-charlotte-carolina-panthers-colts-contract-dave-gettleman.html


“Yeah they made an offer when I talked to (Panthers general manager) Dave Gettleman,” Nicks said. “But you know it just didn’t pan out the right way. I feel like this is the best fit for me.”

...

“After talking to Gettleman I think he agreed that this was the best situation for me too even though they made the offer,” Nicks said. “Like I said I feel like I made the best decision and I’m ready to make the best of it.”

Nicks said he believes he’s the missing piece to the Colts’ puzzle in an attempt to reach the Super Bowl next season.

 

And I won't talk about my opinions on how prior moves affected this, as I've been informed by several angry huddlers that my opinion isn't welcome there either, but I think you can read between the lines in his responses.  We kind of shot ourselves in the foot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow... Full quotes from the blog, and my interpretation, although I've been informed this morning that I'm not allowed to have one, is that we made the larger offer (most likely what was reported yesterday at 4.5M), and yet, Nicks and Gettleman agreed he should go to the Colts...

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/2014/03/hakeem-nicks-charlotte-carolina-panthers-colts-contract-dave-gettleman.html

And I won't talk about my opinions on how prior moves affected this, as I've been informed by several angry huddlers that my opinion isn't welcome there either, but I think you can read between the lines in his responses. We kind of shot ourselves in the foot.

So basically exactly what I said. Nicks stated from Day 1 that he wanted to be the missing piece to a teams puzzle. Letting Ginn walk, and cutting Steve Smith changed that into him needing to be a savior. If Smith and Ginn were on the roster today, Nicks would be a panther, period.

I'm going to start calling it the "Smitty Effect"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow...  Full quotes from the blog, and my interpretation, although I've been informed this morning that I'm not allowed to have one, is that we made the larger offer (most likely what was reported yesterday at 4.5M), and yet, Nicks and Gettleman agreed he should go to the Colts...

 

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/2014/03/hakeem-nicks-charlotte-carolina-panthers-colts-contract-dave-gettleman.html

 

And I won't talk about my opinions on how prior moves affected this, as I've been informed by several angry huddlers that my opinion isn't welcome there either, but I think you can read between the lines in his responses.  We kind of shot ourselves in the foot.

 

If the GM "agrees that you should go somewhere else", that pretty much translates to "I don't want you here".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...