Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kenny Britt visiting Carolina


solorca

Recommended Posts

Has he visited us?? ESPN says so but I heard nothing about it....

Britt, the talented wide receiver whose career has been marked by off-field issues and a major knee injury, also reportedly has visited Carolina, St. Louis, Buffalo and New England. But Patriots owner Robert Kraft reportedly said New England would not sign Britt. 

 

http://espn.go.com/blog/washington-redskins/post/_/id/6420/redskins-remain-interested-in-britt?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more this plays out(silence) the more I'm inclined to believe we are all over this deal. Britt's only real chance to "easily" showcase being a number 1 and getting paid like a no.1 is to come here for a year! Too much competition for the ball in NE and St.Louis. We have a mentor in Cotchery. He will get his shot here. Cotchery/Draft Pick/underwood/Olsen are just good enough to keep defenses honest with him.

Oddly, probably favors the "black,running QB" since most of his success came with Vince Young.

Most likely, they are in a tug of war with Getts, hoping the "50%" leaked info might push him to cave on whatever is up for negotiation.

Maybe I'm just wishful thinking. But his best chance at going over 1000yds and getting PAID next year is in CLT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more this plays out(silence) the more I'm inclined to believe we are all over this deal. Britt's only real chance to "easily" showcase being a number 1 and getting paid like a no.1 is to come here for a year! Too much competition for the ball in NE and St.Louis. We have a mentor in Cotchery. He will get his shot here. Cotchery/Draft Pick/underwood/Olsen are just good enough to keep defenses honest with him.

Oddly, probably favors the "black,running QB" since most of his success came with Vince Young.

Most likely, they are in a tug of war with Getts, hoping the "50%" leaked info might push him to cave on whatever is up for negotiation.

Maybe I'm just wishful thinking. But his best chance at going over 1000yds and getting PAID next year is in CLT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...