Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rookies the Panthers are interested in

Zithers

By Zithers,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

2jakefansinva Newbie

2jakefansinva

Posted
Posted

Gettleman also said he knew that the Jets would take Richardson. Said it was a perfect fit. Gettleman knows his poo. It's amazing it has taken this long for him to get the chance to be a GM with this wealth of knowledge that he has acquired.

 

the huddle will come to love this guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JJman Newbie

JJman

Posted
Posted

JJ, I know everyone has their opinion, but I believe that G-man would lose a lot of goodwill if we ended up with this draft.  The Huddle would be in an uproar, and NFL analysts would be blasting G-man and the organization everywhere.  We would here people talking of conspiracies to screw Cam, or exclamations about not giving Cam any help.  It would be a virtual worl apocalyptic type of situation in Pantherland. 

 

BTW, I could get with the Hurst and Lyerla picks.  Verrett in the first, might make me say "fug", but I'd get over it.  Borland in the second would make me SMDH until the end of time.  People would think that I had an uncontrollable twitch or something.

  

Ugh. That's dreadful. LB in the second and no WR until the 5th and then the next Hernandez in the 6th?

Im sorry you don't like it. But Verrett would be the bpa here and I don't see why he would be such a bad pick. Also, I believe we end up with Britt, so the need for WR really diminishes here, and no need to reach for Benjamin at 28 when he will be a bust regardless.

Anyone that disses Borland has not watched any film on him, and we could use another linebacker on the outside.

Hurst and Fleming are two good tackles, so I don't see the problem in taking them in the 3rd and 4th round respectively.

Norwood and Brown are two guys we are looking at, which is why I mocked them. I don't want either of them, I was really just doing this based of the guys we looked at. Lyerla would be a great pick. Calling him the next Hernandez (A murderer?) is perhaps a bit of a stretch and pure conjecture. Teams like New England, SF, and Cincinnati pick up guys that fall off due too off the field problems/injuries and gets steals doing so (Burfict, Dennard, Blount, Lattimore, etc.)

I had a feeling people wouldn't like this because there aren't any sexy picks. But most these guys are people we already interested in. I usually due mocks based on what I think the team will do, not what I'd do lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted

Signing britt doesn't elimate the need at receiver.

We have nothing but stop gaps at the receiver positon.

this draft is so very deep, recriver will be BPA at somepoint.

What the team brings in never translates to who we draft.

We looked at every receiver last year, and still didn't draft one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ajax4132 Newbie

ajax4132

Posted
Posted

I couldn't get behind Borland that easy

You need to watch his Wisconsin film, he has ELITE instincts and he is a sure tackler

 

Two of the most important qualities to have as a linebacker, I would take him in the 3rd maybe even 2nd in a heartbeat 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ajax4132 Newbie

ajax4132

Posted
Posted

Been saying that for awhile, so I'm glad to see someone else believes that also. Borland will be a stud, he had a rough combine, so he could slip to us in the 3rd. I'd be ecstatic if we got him.

He is always around the ball and is a tackle hound

 

Those types of linebackers ALWAYS seem to do very very well in the NFL lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kuech the Sneak Newbie

Kuech the Sneak

Posted
Posted

You need to watch his Wisconsin film, he has ELITE instincts and he is a sure tackler

Two of the most important qualities to have as a linebacker, I would take him in the 3rd maybe even 2nd in a heartbeat

I know how good he is I just don't think taking a LB in the second round is very smart with the LB core we already have. BPA should only be to a certain extent

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JJman Newbie

JJman

Posted
Posted

He is always around the ball and is a tackle hound

Those types of linebackers ALWAYS seem to do very very well in the NFL lol

Plus his ability to change fields in pursuit of the ball is very impressive. One of Kuechlys main skill sets. People should be excited we are interested in this guy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackofalltrades Rising Star

Jackofalltrades

Posted
Posted

Plus his ability to change fields in pursuit of the ball is very impressive. One of Kuechlys main skill sets. People should be excited we are interested in this guy.

I'm disappointed we'd try to make a OLB out of a ILB. I'm disappointed we'd ignore gaping holes at WR and OT in favor of a back up LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Didn’t watch today but….

      By CRA · Posted

      31st rushing D and 8 carries by Rico is coaching.  Rico is easily the best offensive weapon right now and it’s not really close.  *literally everyone knows Dalton is washed, horrible and shouldn’t even be a backup QB.   Drive 1? ZERO carries.  Coaching.  Drive 2 - Rico was playing great.   Did Canales lean into that or go for “balance”? Coaching. Drive 3 - ZERO carries.  Coaching  Drive 4 - 1 carry and opted for Jimmy Horn gadget rush (you can’t stick  with the Horn repetitive gadget runs each week and that’s not a better idea than getting Rico going)  Drive 5 - basically Dalton heavy as the half expired.  I don’t need to watch a game to know it’s coaching.  The gameplan wasn’t about setting Rico up to go off on a trash rush D.  It was bullshit harmony balance of the rush and the pass and making Hubbard feel good.
    • Lurk21
      Dude come on

      By Lurk21 · Posted

      In the locker room after the Dallas game, multiple  players said FEED him when Canales mentioned Rico stats. That already made me think even the locker room wouldn't care if Rico got the touches rn. This is on Canales indeed and I agree n the Qb take.  We aren't winning  bc of Bryce  but he has been managing it. Had the Jets had Qb aptitude,  we could've probably  lost that game too. All they would've needed is 14 points. Regardless, we got a team  that's being built up and that position needs an overhaul. 
    • ForJimmy
      Dude come on

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      I think he was trying to mimic the Lions with Montgomery and Gibbs. They are just more of the exception to the rule and Brooks was too much of a gamble to be a Gibbs type player. The Lions also didn’t sign Montgomery and draft Gibbs until their offense was nearly set. It was more of a luxury take the offense to the next level type of deal. 
×
×
  • Create New...