All Activity

Pro tip, if your examples are from 20 and 35 years ago its probably not the best example

Obviously, the QB is the highest paid position for a reason. Historically, pass rushers are the second highest paid players for a reason

Like it or hate it there's a reason we did it now and I think it has a lot to do with our 2 rookie pass rushers being banged up

Nooooooooo

This poll was to determine your side of the Huddle civil war wasn’t it.

We do have a QB. Furthermore, Ray Lewis won with Trent Dilfer. Lawrence Taylor won with Phil Simms and Jeff Hostetler. Peppers almost won with Jake Delhomme. It doesn't take an elite QB to win a Super Bowl, it takes an elite team, or at least a good one catching lightning in a bottle.

It’s probably the kind of stupid bullshit that tepper has done since arriving in Charlotte, most notably with the training facility in Spartanburg: make a deal, agree to terms, then demand a little bit more at the very last second after all the work has been done. It’s stupid 80s businessman bullshit

Interesting that this is almost 50/50 0-5 and 6-10.

How did a Theilen thread turn into a…nevermind.

If any decent QB can thrive then why are the top 16 highest paid players and 17 of the top 20 all QBs?

you are all over that cmac ext thread as well, fits you like a glove praising this and that one, I probably would lay low for bit

We've been talking about contract. The contract wasn't stupid by any stretch. His play on the field since he signed it is proof. The trouble you're having is separating his contract and play on the field with the Panthers handling and trade of him afterwards. I 100% think it was dumb to trade him. I understand the thinking but I would still much rather have kept him.

This is why the panthers have the leverage, you either pay up with a decent trade package and if you don’t the Panthers have a good receiver on their team.

If loyalty is worried about Moton having a all pro season, then fleecing us for more then 40 million he may want to investigate this thing we have called "the franchise tag". Its a new invention that I believe we have used before.....hmmm...I wonder on who

I'm personally happy that we extended him. There has been no on field issues do to these knee issues that wouldn't have been even public knowledge. He's not being paid for what he's done in the past. He's been paid what he's worth to retain another 3 seasons.

First of all, we have an offense. Any decent QB can thrive with our O-line, WRs and RBs. Secondly, you don't get better on offense by trading away one of the top five receivers in the league. Thirdly, their FO was crap. Lastly, we're not going about business in a way that's assuming Bryce Young isn't the answer.

Ask them if they're worth two 1sts when you might not have a QB. Give them the full picture. Three years ago we traded two 1sts and more for a QB and we're unsure if he's the solution so should we now turn around and do the same for an elite pass rusher? I don't think you'd find anyone who would tell you that's smart roster management.

The riskiest decision we could make right now is giving another massive wad of guaranteed money to an over 30 OT who is battling chronic knee issues who is still under contract this year.

That's completely insane in the context of what this franchise is.

I hate when people say this. It all depends on what that 4th turns into. Bird in the hand.

100%

Many people disagree. Ask any NFL type if Lawrence Taylor, Reggie White or Julius Peppers or Bruce Smith were worth 2 firsts when they were in their prime.

Notice that most of those wunderkind HC's have actively avoided him.