Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Brisket did it on 57 attempts with 2 picks and only 2 touchdowns in a loss, that’s why no one cares
  3. You haven’t figured out anything buddy, you aren’t nearly as smart as you think you are. I haven’t forgot about your absolutely asinine take about larger people healing from injuries faster because they have more blood and muscle in their bodies
  4. Because due to his rookie deal. Time is up. Rolling with Bryce for 2 more years is huge gamble for a lot of folks.
  5. GWD -- Game-winning drives led by quarterback. Must be an offensive scoring drive in the 4th quarter or overtime that puts the winning team ahead for the last time.
  6. Then the question, if you can't get a reasonable up grade from, Bryce then why move past him will come up from some. It is a question with merit
  7. Because he hasn’t had garbage time production. “Garbage time” has been him bringing us back to win or have a chance to win. Prove me wrong?
  8. Huh? He "only" had 5 4th Quarter Comebacks in 2003. Where are you getting this "trailed in the 4th quarter 12 out of 16 games?" We only ENTERED the 4th quarter trailing 6 total times and we went 3-3 in those games.
  9. Makes me wonder. Yesterday was a rare day when our receivers didn't just get open and make catches but also get YAC. Was part of that reason because we were rather static on where we lined up our guys until now, especially with who is effectively our best receiver? In other words, we surprised the Falcons by exploiting matchups far more than we had before?
  10. Atlanta at home this year. Without looking, what else? And really, you get a GWD for a 30-0 game?
  11. 50% of those nominees were Panthers 1st round draft picks.
  12. I think thats the more likely answer, they wanted to have him focus on that role most likely. The more you diversify his route tree the more complicated it gets for a rookie, but I think him doing it so well this week has shown that he absolutely can get and excel at that. look for a lot more going forward.
  13. Jake Delhomme had 7 game winning drives in 2003 and we won 11 out of 16 games. By this logic, game-winning drives prove Jake was a bad QB because we trailed in the 4th quarter in 12 out of 16 games.
  14. I'll let the clip be the judge. I tend to be cynical about these things.
  15. Cool, now do his wins where the game isn't decided in the 4th quarter/OT. Hint: You could be missing all you toes and fingers to count on just leaving your thumbs, there's a 50/50 shot of being right.
  16. and he has passed for more than 200 yards twice this year already....impressive dude he is
  17. It's extremely bad AI if you pay attention to the details.
  18. There is definitely something fishy about this. I mean his win total is 10 games in 3 seasons. If I counted correctly. The only ten games we won, he gets a GWD every time? And wait a mi Ute how could he have one vs the Jets when Dalton finished the game? When other guys have 30 wins in 3 years and don’t have that near that many? That is a bullshit stat in some way.
  19. He'd have to do a hell of a lot more to be in that conversation. This was a great game, no doubt, but there's been a lot more I'd rather forget than remember.
  1. Load more activity
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      45,935
    • Most Online
      5,843

    Newest Member
    PanthersUSN
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...