All Activity

Someone was reporting some cap stuff too. Vikings need to either create some or wanted us eat more (which in theory would better the pick)

Vikings beat reporter, said they had been talking and that compensation was a day 3 pick. Not likely a 4th, much more likely it's a 5th or two six's.

Source? Sorry if already posted in the past 12 pages. Also, if this is the case, hoping “Day 3” means 4th round.

Hopefully the Niners continue to flounder. Seeing such is truly the gift that keeps on giving.

They gotta realize that once Purdy's crippling cap hits kick in they're gonna be hamstrung.

Yeah. I think so too, especially after handing out yet another massive contract in the offseason.

If they trade theilen at least send him to a team that really needs him like the 49ers or the chiefs so he can rack up some yardage. Doesnt make sense to trade him unless they basically are saying they cant compete this year.

I think the Niners are trying to cash in on a perceived SB window.

There's for sure some hope with the young players on the roster. But we've had young promising talent before and squandered it. Let's see how the coaching staff positions them for success going forward. That's all that will matter.

I think they just like their options at RB and clearly weren't ready to hand him a big contract. Now for the 49ers....I have no idea what their plan is. They already have a massive amount invested in that position.

It's just talk. I don't think that anyone thinks that Parsons will end up anywhere but Dallas. If he does end up on the market, we've already been on a few lists of potential suitors, including one on NFL.com.

The price to trade for him, would likely completely bankrupt our future draft assets. I would have been all for a Hendrickson or Parsons trade in maybe 2017 or 2018. But this team is so far from being good and needs SO much help to build, those draft picks are almost priceless. Let's not forget the insane cost it took to get Bryce and how much that harmed our drafting ability.

People like to say that, but I don't know if it's true. We went a few years trying to answer the QB question on the cheap amid bad coaching. We did what other teams do and tried to address QB by giving up a king's ransom and moving up. I mean, I guess that could be considered a "splash move," but I see it more as trying to draft the next big thing at QB. I think that he's been more impatient than anything else. He gave too much power to Rhule who didn't know what the hell he was doing and relied on Fitterer who left a lot to be desired as well. Sure, we may have tried to get Watson and Stafford, but that's all a part of trying to answer the question at QB. "Splash moves?" maybe, but I think it's just business as usual for teams without a QB. Parsons would be a "splash move," but he's about as sure a thing that you could acquire for the capital.

Yeah, not sure about that unless we really have a dominant offense, especially running game. If not.....then what was it worth?

I'd be ok with a 2nd and 4th and 6th for Hendrickson because I think that's at least in the realm of sanity but the haul that Dallas wants for Parsons is well into the realm of absolute insanity.

I wouldn't trade future 1sts for any non-QB in the league given our current situation. We gotta figure out QB. Hopefully Bryce is it but we can't be parting with future 1sts until we've solved that riddle.

I dont want to trade for them. Lets give the rooks the season to see what we have. We aren't 1 player away and giving up that much draft capital and then tying up that salary would hurt us for 2-3years. You only take swings like that when you're 1-2 players away.

How does anyone still think we're getting Parsons? Even if you trade a haul. Why would he want to play here?

if we trade him needs to be for ILB or corner depth or borderline starting safety.

Cam Jackson showed hella speed when he was out there. I was surprised by it actually.

feels like just yesterday I was being lectured as a delusional non-objective hater for discussing an AT to Minny deal and why it could make sense for both parties.

I wouldn't even trade dj wonnum and two firsts much less what GB offered. lol

Anyone that wants us to do anything remotely close to that has completely lost their damn mind.

Information from good sources say that the Packers trade offer was real, so Dallas did in fact turn down two firsts, a second and Rashan Gary for Parsons. Jones has said they won't trade him, so he's probably going to stay stubborn or thinks he can get three firsts plus extra picks and a player back.

Tepper has been looking for this giant splash move that bypasses a rebuilding process ever since he bought the team. It's an approach that will most likely just continue to dig the hole deeper.