top dawg

I believe that his wife tweeted it. I don't think we have to hide that we're possibly adding Cohen. He's not the hottest commodity. He's a dart throw.

I really don't understand why you wouldn't have been high on him as a passer because he was historically accurate in college. It's really not his passing that's getting him, it's his processing. It's the same reason why he slid in the draft.

You know how to rub it in.

Exactly what I was thinking.

That's a product of coaching, personnel and inexperience.

I obviously disagree with your general sentiment, but I understand. The only thing I'll argue is that one player can make a huge difference depending upon how effective that he is, but I think that coaching and play calling can even make a bigger difference when players are missing. That didn't happen yesterday.

I don't know what this thing going around the Huddle is about Young having a weak arm. I guess it makes some people feel better.

I mean, I'm sure Smith-Marsette and Mingo can run a legit deep route. Yesterday, we just did not have good coaching. Situationally, the coaching/play calling left a lot to be desired.

No team has ever done a literal "total rebuild." The closest thing you'll ever see to a total rebuild is what Prime did at Colorado. We are trying to rebuild this team into a perennial winner, much like the team's in the top echelon of the league. I guess you could call it a makeover, but that doesn't sound as manly. We're basically just trying to set down and establish a framework--a production machine that will keep turning out winners every year regardless of the specific parts. We have never been that.

Well, the Bears might just use those picks on a QB. Not to say that Fields has had the best circumstances...

I can't give him a pass due to an injury, because he was playing. If he can't help the team, he needs to sit his ass down. Philly felt free to let him go for a reason. Just saying.

Great throw and catch.

Who is this Packers Reed or Reid guy?

Maybe a half a brain is too much of an expectation...

Moreover, talking about Bryce Young in terms of experience is not equal to discussing the fact that the entire team essentially needs experience and a development of chemistry.

You're the one who pooed my post talking about experience. You're also the one who began talking about experience as a fan (and other things like equating Young to Pickles). I think you're the one that needs to sit down, have a drink, and calm down.

If you think that experience doesn't mean anything to young NFL players and coaches in new positions with more authority, I don't think you'll ever understand the dynamics of professional football, and team building in general.

Actually, you're drawing conclusions after one game. But, to answer your question, most analysts (if not all of them) understand that Bryce is a rookie. Likewise, most analysts picked the Saints to win the division, and the nine-year vet Carr is a big reason for that.

It all starts with the O-line.

Great play call by the Packers for a TD

Uh, experience. Don't underestimate it.

But it wasn't the same poo. The O-line looked like a pro Online today. Moreover, we didn't have a turnover problem in the preseason. And, our starters on the D-line actuallyade a difference. Our problem today was largely inexperience and a lack of chemistry. If you tell that the rookies should've been given more snaps during the preseason, or that maybe Reich should have opened it up a little more, then I'd say that's about the only substantive way that preseason maybe affected us. Going 0-3 in the preseason was largely meaningless.

This take makes no sense, particularly within the context of the game.

And hopefully a last for Reich.

The OC of course.