MasterAwesome

Icky needs to clean up those MAs - Mental Arrors.

I guess it's time to resurface this Reddit post:

You’re the one coming across as an alias…FOR ROBERT SALEH

I'm not sure anything was "confirmed" by Armstead's injury. There was no mention of chippiness or anything out of the ordinary on the play where he got injured. In fact, it was the first play of team drills for what appears to be a result of pretty standard contact. Armstead has a lengthy injury history so this isn't some crazy shock injury that you can reasonably chalk up to having anything to do with it being a joint practice. The fact that it was a joint practice is what appears to be "immaterial" to borrow your language.

Properly critiquing the pass rush I think is going to be dependent upon whether Burns and/or Houston play tomorrow. Ideally we'd have enough depth not to have to rely on them, but still it's very hard to properly evaluate your pass rush when you're missing your two best pass rushers (one of them being arguably the best player on your entire roster). O-line for sure is fair game and something I think we'll all be keying in on.

I don't recall this being their narrative. It was moreso the narrative of an edgy Huddle mod lol. I think it was reported that the Panthers and Jets met earlier that day and came to an agreement to cancel the joint practice.

Are you being deliberately obtuse? It's not about "making the panthers look bad", it's about making the Jets look good. No one is arguing that HBO has a personal vendetta against the Carolina Panthers...we just happened to be the Jets' opponent, so them looking good and us looking bad kinda go hand in hand. If they were playing against *insert NFL team here*, it'd likely be a similar outcome.

Fitt looks like he's ready to suit up and get in there himself. You can't deny he looks the part.

I never suggested you bragged about Fields' preseason game. I was simply asking if you think my theoretical characterization of his performance was fair and objective or if you think it comes across as a hater take. If Bryce can be criticized for one individual sack that you say he didn't feel the pressure on, then I don't see why you couldn't criticize Fields for his one pretty errant screen pass that was behind DJ who had to adjust. For the record I think both are very nitpicky, but I'm looking for consistency on your takes. On a side note: are you talking about the Herbert TD where the Bears' line let people through easily? Because that was clearly a designed screen pass, so letting people through to get to the second level is kind of the design of the playcall lol. I mean maybe they disengaged a tad bit too quickly (or maybe Herbert slipped out a bit late, it's hard to say), but that TD was 90% credited to blocking. I think you are so quick to criticize the Bears' o-line that you don't recognize that they were ironically the star of the preseason game IMO. DJ basically caught the screen pass and ran a straight line for 62 yards to the end zone because of the superb blocking of the o-line on that play. Herbert went untouched for almost 50 yards before doing a good job powering through contact within the 5-yard line to secure the TD.

Respectfully, I wholeheartedly disagree. Based off everything I've seen from you over the last couple years, I think if we're looking at an alternate reality where we took Stroud #1 overall and he had the exact performance as Young on Saturday, I have little doubt that you'd be raising hell exclusively about the o-line. Similarly, if this was Fields' rookie preseason debut, I think you'd be up in arms about the terrible protection and how they're failing their brand new 1st round QB if that's the kind of o-line they're putting around him. It'd be like after Fields' 3-3 129 yards 2 TD performance, if I just chose to emphasize how his screen pass to DJ was ugly, he had like 3 total air yards on his passes, and hey maybe his coaches still don't trust his arm if they're basically only giving him screen/swing passes. Would you read that assessment of Fields' performance and be like "Well, none of that is technically wrong. That's a pretty fair and objective take" or would you think "hmmm this guy sounds like a bit of a hater"? And then I talked about how tons of people are saying his performance was Fool's Gold and unimpressive and linked a few articles/videos saying just that. Those are the kind of vibes you're giving off.

Yeah obviously there's truth in all of those evaluations. The double standards are with the framing of your posts and what you choose to highlight when talking about a player unprompted. There's a difference between not disputing that some of Fields' sacks were on him, vs. readily jumping at the opportunity to criticize him for not feeling the pressure on those sacks. You have never done the latter for Fields, despite him leading the league in Sack Rate in each of the last two seasons. You were quick to do so for Bryce's very first preseason game. That's pretty telling. Yes Bryce "not flashing" is up for dispute. Plenty of people would argue that poise in the pocket and showing the ability to quickly go through progressions are areas you can "flash" in for your NFL debut. Arguably those are the hardest traits for rookies to acquire in their transition to the NFL. You seem to be one of those "Box Score" analysts who extracts all of his talking points straight from the Box Score, which meshes with the other thread where you extracted your talking points straight from article headlines rather than diving into the substance of the articles. Your bar for objectivity seems to be that you don't egregiously lie about players. That's a pretty silly bar. You can be "not wrong" about your analyses but be heavily biased in your framing of certain players' performances. Highlighting the positives of players you like and dismissing/ignoring the negatives, while highlighting the negatives of players you dislike and ignoring/dismissing the positives. I don't even think you dislike Bryce, I think you're doing that petty thing that lots of people do where you spite-post because you're annoyed at how many people were/are hyping him up when you wanted someone else.

I mean the problem was I was giving you too much credit that you actually read the articles you're referencing. None of those articles attribute fault to Young, quite the opposite (as realmjl posted). You were clearly alluding to these "tons of articles" highlighting Young's disappointing debut as a knock against Young, so I was excluding articles like these that you linked to, which were complimentary of Young but referred to his debut as "disappointing" in the most surface-level sense. Obviously a 21-yard performance and under constant duress is "disappointing" from a production standpoint. The entire context around your post was about these rookie QBs looking "lost" and you throw Bryce in there amongst Richardson and Stroud despite even these articles you linked, talking about his poise and awareness and going through his progressions. Quite the opposite of looking lost.

You like to present yourself as this arbiter of objectivity who keeps it real. But let's take a look at how you treat your guys vs. someone like Young. Fields (all last year): poor guy played behind an awful o-line, can't hold it against him with that kind of supporting cast, etc. Stroud (preseason game 1): only threw four passes, people are overreacting to his awful interception Bryce (preseason game 1): meh, looked okay...didn't flash. Didn't feel the pressure at times. Tons of articles highlighting his disappointing debut (lol) So Bryce threw two more passes than Stroud and you're pretty comfortable evaluating (i.e. criticizing) his performance, whereas Stroud's sample size was just far too small to be critical. Also Bryce getting drilled multiple times behind awful protection was his fault that he didn't feel the pressure...but poor Fields who took a million sacks in college and also unsurprisingly a million sacks in the NFL is just a victim of his terrible o-line. Nothing attributing his sacks to his own awareness like you've done to Bryce. The double standards are pretty wild actually. You think you are objective? Far from it.

Can you link to a few of these "tons of articles"? I'm genuinely struggling to find even one.

Yeah and that Brian Burns guy who’s supposed to be our best player didn’t even make a SINGLE impact play!! Oh wait…

I for one can’t believe they’re just gonna bitch out like that.

I was gonna say Stephen Hill. I don't even know if he qualified as a "Preseason Warrior", I was just in awe of a 6'4 WR running a 4.3 40.

If CJ Stroud ends up struggling in the NFL with the processing, progressions, etc. and Bryce Young exhibits this elite level of awareness from your firsthand account, I think the S2 test will be getting an enormous boon to its credibility.

Came here for boobies and groin...leaving disappointed.

I get the excuses for Stroud, they’re valid. What I don’t get, is how Corral went through the exact same thing last preseason, if not a worse situation (running for his life behind an awful o-line, worst coaching staff in the league, very few offseason reps) and yet a sizable contingent on these boards were pretty unforgiving and wrote him off as clearly not belonging in the league.

They were technically missing probably their best defender (Sauce Gardner), but with the way our team is built, I don't know how much of a difference he would have made. We don't really have a true #1 WR and our offense seems to be built around spreading the ball around. Bryce is the kind of cerebral QB to go through his progressions and find the open guy, instead of keying in on any particular receiver and forcing the pass.

I wasn't arguing about his promise, just against the notion that you can't be a 24-year-old raw prospect. But if we are talking about promise: call me a homer, but I'm trusting the evaluation of a respected defensive mind like Evero over whoever this Tosh Lupoi dude is lol (Oregon Ducks DC). As someone who was repeatedly on record as thinking very little of Justin Herbert as a prospect based on how his coaching staff used him (incidentally also from the Oregon Ducks, albeit different coaches), I am surprised you're so trusting of another college coaching staff haha. You also rail against UNC's coaching staff (particularly on defense) pretty often if I'm not mistaken. Seems like there are quite a lot of idiots out there coaching college football, no? Maybe they did have it right with DJ...I'm not stating otherwise, simply that I'm keeping an open mind.

I think you harp too much simply on age, when I'd say rawness has much more to do with experience and proper coaching. Sometimes those all go hand in hand, but not necessarily. Like in the case of DJ who played exclusively TE his junior year and then had to juggle DE/TE duties his senior year. It'd be easy to see how his development as a DE could be stunted when his coaches didn't commit him to that role in college. At 24 years old, DJ is still in the early stages of his prime. It's not like he's a raw 35 year old who is going to be physically limited in his attempt to develop in a new position compared to his peers. I really don't see a meaningful difference between a raw 22 year old prospect playing out his rookie contract through age 26, vs. a raw 24 year old prospect playing out his rookie contract through age 28.

Hearing these relatively unknown players flashing consistently during camp is what adds much needed excitement to the preseason games. I'm definitely going to be keying in on guys like these two, and Grugier-Hill which is another name we've been hearing a lot of.

Do the Falcons practice behind a nursing home?