
ECHornet
HUDDLER-
Posts
1,896 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by ECHornet
-
I think we’d trade back and grab a QB
-
We sign Armstead and we’re definitely going QB Round 1
-
1. AJ Bouye (N/CB): (cap # next year =4.7 mil. Cap savings of 3.5 million, but adding 1.2 mil in Dead Cap) Would not cut Bouye, but would trade for equivalent draft pick/player. Especially if we resign one of Gilmore or Jackson - I hope we let Jackson walk. 2. Dennis Daley (OG/OT): (cap # next year =2.5+ mil. Cap Savings of 2.5 mil, adding only 31k in Dead Cap) Assuming spotrac is correct here, the contract is so cheap I wouldn’t cut prior to free agency/draft. 3. Pat Elflein (C/OG): (cap # next year =7+ mil. Cap Savings of 4.7 mil, but adding 2.4 mil in Dead Cap) *Eflein would be a lot cheaper to cut next year Keep. Likely our starting Center next year for now. 4. Morgan Fox (DL): (cap # next year =5.6 mil. Cap Savings of 3 mil, but adding 2.5+ mil in Dead Cap) Keep unless a trade for equivalent draft pick value is available. He is a solid contributor. 5. Sam Franklin Jr (S): (cap # next year =900K. Cap Savings of 895K, adding only 5k in Dead Cap) Keep. Cheap contract and young. 6. Liram H. (K): (cap # next year =825K. Cap Savings of 825K, adding 0 in Dead Cap) *We will probably try to bring back Zane G. if possible and let Hiram go Cut. Resign Zane 7. Myles Hartsfield (DB): (cap # next year =896+K. Cap Savings of 895K, adding only 1k in Dead Cap) Keep. Cheap contract and minimal savings vs production. 8. Michael Jordan (OG): (cap # next year =965K. Cap Savings of 965K, adding 0 in Dead Cap) Keep. Cheap and minimal savings. Potential cut post free agency/draft. 9. Cam Erving (OL): (cap # next year =6.5+ mil. Cap Savings of 2 mil, adding 4.5 in Dead Cap) Keep. Savings not worth giving him up as depth. Potential trade post free agency/draft. Likely player for player.
-
Those days are behind us.
-
Thank you for this. I enjoy the anonymous coach interviews that provide opportunities to get their opinions out there without revealing the source. I bet if one was done of ACC coaches about which QB they would rather have on their team, Howell or Pickett, there may have been one or two that chose Pickett.
-
I enjoyed the commentary but didn’t get to listen to all of it. What’s your beef with talent evaluation of Brady? Seems most they were discussing is technique that needs to be corrected. He looked solid for a 3rd round rookie OL.
-
Agree with the idea that all are unproven. That’s why I said “I believe so.”
-
Restructuring can also use existing cap space to make future cap space better. Robbie could be an example there, right?
-
There would be no talk about a QB that was #1 on many draft boards coming into the year? Doubtful
-
Improving on the players that are currently your starters? Yes, that seems a pretty good place to start.
-
Is he better than Darnold/current Cam? I believe so. So yes, I would like him behind this line.
-
'20 Cam vs. '21 Garoppolo (and '19) (+ a Darnold tidbit)
ECHornet replied to Dory's topic in Carolina Panthers
I’m good with bringing Cam back for cheap as long as he’s content being the short yardage + red zone option only. -
I think it’s obvious we didn’t want to get rid of Shaq or CMC this year.
-
I’m fine with the risk. Throw him out there and if it doesn’t work, you’re likely sitting with a top 5 pick in 2023. Would also be likely to flip Willis for a 2nd/4th/6th a year or two later it he’s not the guy. As we learned the hard way there will be a team desperate enough to take a chance on a 1st round QB still on his rookie contract.
-
Not a prediction of who will end up best, but pure excitement level list for me… 1. Willis 2. Howell 3. Pickett 4. Ridder 5. Strong 6. Corral 7. Zappe 8. Purdy
-
Josh Allen didn’t win a damn thing at Wyoming. If he couldn’t elevate his team in the Mountain West, what good is he right? No, I don’t think Howell is anywhere close to Allen, but at least use a stronger argument.
-
This is a tough decision. IMO, if you don’t have a lengthy contract with a franchise QB, you should never pass an opportunity to select the first QB off the board. Especially if you may be down to the 3rd tackle on your board like some mocks show as a possibility.
-
Compare Trevor Lawrence’s stats to Howell’s and then re-assess why you believe Howell was underwhelming. Unless, of course, you didn’t think Lawrence was the golden child QB prospect in college.
-
Yes, both teams getting an equal opportunity is what he wants.
-
Things couldn’t have set up better for Tepper and Rhule
ECHornet replied to mcsmoak's topic in Carolina Panthers
How would you describe the Bengals OL performance yesterday? Looked a lot like us up front. -
Things couldn’t have set up better for Tepper and Rhule
ECHornet replied to mcsmoak's topic in Carolina Panthers
I can see that argument. I’d counter with one has an already established ceiling in the NFL while the other could be better. -
Things couldn’t have set up better for Tepper and Rhule
ECHornet replied to mcsmoak's topic in Carolina Panthers
They made it to the Super Bowl with that line. You get there and mission has been accomplished from a team building perspective. -
Things couldn’t have set up better for Tepper and Rhule
ECHornet replied to mcsmoak's topic in Carolina Panthers
For those who want Mayfield, why not trade back in the first and go after Howell (if he stays lower first Rd projection)? They are very similar. Drafting Howell = acquiring more picks + cheap contract for years Mayfield = trade away more picks + expensive contract -
I'm fine with that. Just thinking it over, I don't see the downside with signing him five years to provide stability in the QB room with at minimum a solid backup option. He'd be 32 at the end of that contract. Playing a role in my thought process is I still believe he's a mid to bottom third starter in the league, and we can get him here for cheap. Why not?
-
Oh no! Winning more games? The horror