Jump to content

Jaxel

HUDDLER
  • Posts

    3,115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jaxel

  1. I would take a chance on him if we are out of the top 10. Richardson has some series tools.
  2. I bet if the Panthers are picking in the teens and he is available, he will be a Panther.
  3. I think Moore is off the table unless it's just an outrageous offer. Like if the giants decided they can compete and sent 2 first round picks and some change for him or something like that. Otherwise I think Panthers are very happy with his contact and his skills and have no reason to move him.
  4. Half of Rattlers problem is a porous OLine and WRs dropping balls. Every game I watch there is at least 5 to 6 dropped passes. It's unreal.
  5. This all comes down to stopping the run. If we force 3rd and long situations we have a good chance.
  6. Well I'm glad this joke thread blew up, nice to lighten things up around here lol.
  7. To be fair, this is clearly in jest, I'm not advocating that we sign him.
  8. But the idea of him playing twice against the falcons intrigues no one? I think it would be hilarious.
  9. What are the repercussions for the Colts if they cut Matt Ryan, and if they did, would you sign him to finish out the year? This will not happen, but fun scenario to walk through.
  10. I'm all about it, I hope Wilks turns this ship around. We can still get a QB in the draft regardless.
  11. PJ has always had great mechanics, he just routinely made dumb plays under pressures and went for the most difficult throws, he says he has learned that not the way to go. Great chance in of hime, we will see if he can keep it up.
  12. We gotta lose enough to get him, but we about to go on that 4 game win streak lol.
  13. Definitely agree on not taking him Top 10, this is in reference to if we finish somewhere in the 12-20 range. Possibly through a trade back or something.
  14. No man, he plays is one of the most awful systems devoid of talent you could almost ever watch play, and some how still puts out okay numbers. Make no mistake Stanford is an awful program with no talent right now. That guy can make all the throws, great arm, good mobility. His adjuster accuracy rate is way above the numbers. You need to watch him play to understand. https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Tanner-McKee-QB-Stanford
  15. Tanner McKee come on down lmao.
  16. To be fair, they put on a clinic on what not to do in the last 5 minutes of that game. Some of the most boneheaded coaching I've seen.
  17. That's his goal, tank but look competitive.
  18. Not true, they legit such as person and newton said multiple times it owuld be tough to get a 1 for CMC.
  19. Multiple Panthers reporters confirmed this Adam's report though.
  20. Your not taking a 2024 and 2025 first from the Rams, for instance - first of all the value of a 2024 first is not equal to that of a 2023 first, and they are essentially late round picks. I think I saw someone posted comparable trades and the players Jacksonville and the Jets got and it was bad. So For example, I think Fiterrer would think a lot harder if it was say, the eagles pick in the top 10 right now and next years first than 2 late round firsts.
  21. Agree, this is why I don't take Bryce Young number 1 either. Part of number one is measurables and potential. QB's can learn and grow the mind with study and experience, but you can't grow 5 inches. It has to be part of the evaluation.
×
×
  • Create New...