CRA

True. But Trevor was still that dude largely in the college playoff. And every team they saw minus Notre Dame was more talented. his resume….IMO is the best college resume of the last decade. so you take that plus his tools and I get the generational talk. But as I said, he wasn’t even the best Clemson QB of that decade. Resume and play aren’t the same things

Trevor also has a lot of injuries creeping on him the last 2 years. Wouldn’t be surprised if he takes the intentional short career route of his own choosing. Seeing that more and more. He is a smart kid and from the jump he sees beyond football.

Trevor had the generational resume though. 3 seasons, 3 undefeated regular seasons. Only 2 Ls that came in the playoffs. And he checked every physical box. but he wasn’t as good as Watson at Clemson.

all I know is the couple clips of the Jags new HC.....man does he come off poorly. Well, Trevor...you will always be a Clemson GOAT/college footbal GOAT. You at least have that. This dude ain't saving your floundering NFL career.

I frankly love Jake Delhomme. But yeah, I love him today. I love his story. Loved he made the average dude think, hell....maybe. I liked he gambled. I liked pre Tommy Jone attitude. In real time? I didn't love Jake. I often screamed at him the moment he launched up a deep ball downfield because it was so often a poor decision that somehow would work out to 89 in triple coverage. There was a magic to Jake that is best appreciated after he was done playing. Which I do. But there is some revisionist history on how much the fanbase loved him in real time of his career.

hog mollies. dawgs. one of us. yeah, I agree. How about let's not draft projects, injured guys, etc. Draft dudes that can help ASAP

Time made Jake more beloved IMO than he was in real time.

yeah, I keep getting that stuff wrong. He got in the first time he was a finalist. Which is where Luke is now right.

you right, glanced a pfr and misread the vote placement as a win.

their resume's are virtually identical. Like crazy identical. Same PB, AP, DROY, DPOY. Willis' stats slant to the pass rush (sacks) and Luke's to coverage (INTs).

I think specifically, Joe Brady not figuring out the short yardage game. I think the rest of it was fine. KC clearly figured out the their short yardage play from the jump of that game. Buffalo seemed so sure it was their own auto yard getter they had no adjustment in the back pocket. almost feel like playcallers should just have the national broadcast running. Romo from the jump was like yep, KC figured that out on film and made adjustment. all that being said, I think the refs still tilted the final result to the KC more so than Brady costing them the game if I had to pick between the 2.

Sanders at #1 and Milroe at #3 seems insane. I like TMAC in a vacuum but I want D

Ohio State/Notre Dame had the 3rd smallest viewership of the championship games in the CFP era. Ohio State now actually account 2 of the 3 lowest viewed championship games. This past game surpasses 21s Ohio State/Bama game. Just getting big names doesn’t auto mean big views

got to root for a Bills/Commanders Super Bowl at this point. Then cheering on the young fella.

yep. I mean, basically everyone I wanted to see play each other in the ACC this year.....wasn't on the regular season schedule. And it's not new. It's just far worse. I use to give my SEC chest thumping friends poo because Clemson in the last decade of college football....Clemson saw mighty Bama far more often than SC even thought about it. I mean, if your brag and defense is you play in the Bama conference but never really play them. If you are playing a team once every 3 or 4 years......you aren't really in their conference IMO

well, I can't disagree with that part of the equation. The 3-4 OLB is much easier to go find in today's football. But I wonder how much of that is just the reality of so many NFL teams running the 3-4 looks and thus the 3-4 OLB gets the attention. For a while the narrative was pass pass pass and countering with the blitz schemes to stop the pass. So many of the "good" NFL teams this year....were defined by their ability to run the ball this year. If NFL teams were pushing the 4-3 again would we actually see more better looking 4-3 DEs? I wonder about that.

I wish we would just go back to the 4-3. 3-4 is just so dependent on that NT. It's great when you got it, but when you don't......it's just rough sledding. Easier to deal with injuries and fixes in the 4-3

going forward, we should pretend he doesn't exist. Whatever you get out of him is a bonus. We need a Hubbard compliment. We should draft one in round 4ish.

Looking forward to an offseason of them continuing to ruin college football more and more. ACC now saying they think they should have a regular season champ. Park that team to the side. Let the 2nd and 3rd teams play for the ACC “championship”. Have 2 champions with the regular season champ protected from actually having to prove to be that. Stupid. Hope that gets shot down. Bad ideas tend to bleed over. Other sports. reality is SMU didn’t play Clemson, Miami and the top of the ACC in season. Conferences are too big. So yeah, you 100% have to play a real title game to be the champion. Because it exposes you to the actual best teams.

I still keep thinking of that Hard Knocks clip where the NYGs GM is told by his son to draft Daniels and the owner tells him he won’t be able to handle Saquon doing what he just did in Philly.

maybe. The NFL like every other aspect of society is also just simplistically filled with it's own share of bad people you don't want working for you.....and eventually how good you are with a football in your hands doesn't trump everything. Every idiot in the NFL isn't a CTE victim that isn't right.

well, I guess you could argue he is brilliant.....and the NFL is just entertainment (legally defined) and not actual sport

the OP has names like Kennan Allen, Chris Godwin, etc. in it. I don't not consider those dudes to be true #1s in the year 2025. I don't want to invest draft stock into old WRs who presently aren't even #1s. That doesn't project out to be an answer for us. That's a rental.

Summary for those that didn't watch: Cam broke some dudes face in a boxing/fight challenge and that guy had to go home. Felt it was an odd challenge to even have because their was clearly no one you could pit against Cam and it be remotely fair. Sure he was a tall swimmer but from the jump I told my wife the math wasn't mathing and there was no one you could pair Cam up w/ and that it would feel remotely ok. Surprise of the show is Golden Tate IMO. Who definitely doesn't seem wired the way we would dream up an uber successful pro athlete. Same for the gymnast.

He eats the stuff. Nothing really to say. Those animals live a better life before becoming dinner than the cow, pig and chicken I eat (who all are breed and live to just be a meal)