-
Posts
19,829 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by ForJimmy
-
Trey Lance on nfl network as if 12pm est
ForJimmy replied to raleigh-panther's topic in Carolina Panthers
Started just as many games as Mac Jones. I would argue the gap between his competition was less than what Jones was facing too... -
Trey Lance on nfl network as if 12pm est
ForJimmy replied to raleigh-panther's topic in Carolina Panthers
I think picks 3-7 are up for grabs. None of those teams are in a spot where they need a QB and they have too many other needs to ignore. Denver and the Niners are our competition for a trade up. Basically I think it’s Lawrence, Fields at 1 and 2 and we just have to prevent Denver and San Fran from jumping us and taking the other 2. I don’t see WFT trading up to select another QB in Fields or Lance who, one is from the same school as Haskins and two had one great season like Haskins did. They will sign a vet or take someone safe like a Mac Jones. Just my thoughts... -
Trey Lance on nfl network as if 12pm est
ForJimmy replied to raleigh-panther's topic in Carolina Panthers
If we get Lance/Fields at 8 and a LT in the 2nd I will be thrilled. -
How does his LT look? I’ve heard he might be a 2nd rounder. We doubling up and getting Lance plus his LT?
-
Trey Lance on nfl network as if 12pm est
ForJimmy replied to raleigh-panther's topic in Carolina Panthers
Do you think all 4 are gone before we pick? -
Interesting note, he has the same number of career starts as Mac Jones...
-
I wouldn’t be completely upset about Mac Attack Jones, but in comparison to Lance....
-
He will become my draft crush and be there at 8, while we draft Mac...
-
What time does his pro day start?
-
In the middle as it has potential, but still some minor concerns. I’m assuming Lance or Fields will make it until 8. Wishing we had lost games last year is pointless and nonsense. If we love a guy we will trade up for him if needed. Aside from Lawrence, I see concerns with every QB in this draft. If we can’t get Watson, I’m for sitting back and seeing who falls to us. If no one does get a LT or trade down.
-
Somewhere in the middle?
-
Hopefully he doesn’t throw himself into the top 5...
-
Josh Norris believes WR 3 is a big need this offseason
ForJimmy replied to GoobyPls's topic in Carolina Panthers
QB and LT are still the biggest needs. I’m sure will sign a vet WR or draft someone like Rogers from Clemson in the middle rounds. You (likely) won’t find a capable QB or LT in the middle rounds. -
ohhhhhhh boy. sounds like watson is getting traded. per jim trotter
ForJimmy replied to PhillyB's topic in Carolina Panthers
I mean it would take 2 firsts and most likely another pick to jump to 2/3 to draft an unknown in Fields/Wilson. 3 firsts is most likely the STARTING point for Watson.... -
ohhhhhhh boy. sounds like watson is getting traded. per jim trotter
ForJimmy replied to PhillyB's topic in Carolina Panthers
Don’t complain about him complaining about people complaining! -
Ronald Curry?? As in THE Ronald Curry?! Also the Falcons need to piss off and keep Matt Ryan. He is their burden to bear...
-
ohhhhhhh boy. sounds like watson is getting traded. per jim trotter
ForJimmy replied to PhillyB's topic in Carolina Panthers
Did we trade for him yet? -
ohhhhhhh boy. sounds like watson is getting traded. per jim trotter
ForJimmy replied to PhillyB's topic in Carolina Panthers
-
My only guess is they thought getting a starting QB, CB, FS, DT, LT, LG, RG, TE, slot WR, AND both LB positions was a little too much for one offseason, so they held on to Shaq. Do I agree with it? No, but at least he is just overpaid and not a liability on defense.
-
Jones is tough. Is it his fault his team was loaded? No? Did he thrive with all of that talent? Yes! Record breaking season. He and Lance have the most unknowns, but Lance has the most potential of anyone in the draft. Rhule got a nice up close look at him in the senior bowl. If we draft him, it’s because Rhule thinks he can be the guy.
-
I guess my thought process (though now proven wrong) was he isn’t making any more total and we would be eating dead money if he is traded which means the team taking him would be responsible for his salary minus the dead money we are eating. This would be assuming a team wanted to give up capital for him, but stated his salary was too high.
-
Any chance it’s a way of trading him while eating some of his salary because it was too high to move him?