csx

Kind of odd. He was already GM of the 49ers and just going in to his second season when the sale was unfolding.

Neither have won anything

Like every other rookie. Do you have a point other than grasping for negatives?

That term doesn't mean what you think it does apparently.

In 1980 the linebackers were 220lbs - 230lbs and the defensive tackles were 260-270. Riggins would get dropped quickly

Given how many a proponents of tanking we have I would assume the same would be in favor of riding Young the whole way. He's either playing well or bad enough to get a high pick. No?

I'm always for drafting offensive lineman so yes a little disappointed here.

The Huddle is back! give it enough time and itd always the same handful moaning all day everyday like they are getting paid for it

Non of that is relevant to my point though. I'm not saying he's worth being traded for based on his year on the Panthers. I'm suggesting that he may be more like his career average and a contender might need vet rotational piece and some deal could be made that's any tiny bit better than just dumping him.

Yes and Gilmore and Clowney . What's the point?

Exactly. Look at this poo https://www.si.com/nfl/lions/news/lions-2023-nfl-draft-grades

Sanders was a 5 yds per carry career guy over 4 seasons until he came to this dumpster fire of coaching and OL injuries. It's not insane to think he could be more productive in a new system behind a bolstered interior line. Cutting him helps nothing. The very best scenario is to give him the ball and if he looks good hope for a mid season trade for something while Brooks gets back to 100%. Such as a serious contender responding to injuries needing vet help. (Chiefs, etc)

The inside depth chart needs a lot help than outside is a better way to say I suppose

True but variety of types is valid and the coach (especially one of his background) selecting deliberately is understandable.

What's there to grade in April?

Look at the roster and who we had at each. The OLB two deep was set. The inside wasnt.

Nothing. It's April

I admit to not paying close attention to it but I've not heard anyone outside this community say he's not a good blocker. Just the opposite

He's worthy of being on the roster for the grunt work but not at his salary. Ideally he would stay at greatly reduced salary. Unfortunately TEs are either receivers or blockers. I heard it said Gronk was last true TE

One of the guys in the first short list of prospect meetings. So they were eying him.

Yeah we have more than enough at running back. Hopefully one of these udfa offensive lineman can become serviceable depth

No

Leggette doesn't need to start day 1 either. Regardless of when he was taken he's a 2nd rounder. He should certainly contribute day 1. Day 1 is irrelevant really. What matters is the years these guys contribute not the games first season

Brooks no.

It get repeated by a handful of you in every thread. We know where Morgan worked.