Jon Snow

Thanks. I'm not sure I would want any of his players anyway.

Does he have anyone we could trade him Corral for?

The so called depth got outplayed by the two DII UDFA's. Plain and simple. Ice up son.

I'm sure there's a plan for him. It might just be special teams. He might just be a placeholder for someone yet to be signed. Who knows? No worries.

It's a work in progress.

For Cam Erving being let go.

He also has a season of nfl playing time on Corral. Yet he was let go. Corral might a bag of stale chips but he's our stale chips. If you're going to sign someone else's mistake you better have wanted the guy in the first place. Apparently we didn't.

It's not that he didn't step up but rather he got outplayed.

No

The the reasons he wasn't signed, he doesn't want to be here and we dont need him. End of discussion.

Never heard of any of them.

WE NEED ANSWERS!!!!!!!

It doesn't matter if you target him, he has to want to come here. Besides, you cannot run your offense that way. You cannot tie up a chunk of cap in an aging receiver that you will have to focus your offense on. That doesn't help Youngs development at all. That's backwards thinking.

Hopkins is not coming here. Get that thought out of your head. We will be drafting our guys unless it's an injury situation that forces us to. Then it will be someone you've never heard of.

He's a good receiver. Nothing wrong with his play. His contract is an indication of his health concerns. We signed him thinking that he may not be available all season. I see no problem here.

It will take time. You cannot fix everything that was wrong with this team in one offseason. There was just too much FUBAR to overcome at once.

I'm not worrying about anything until it proves to be a concern. You should have known that this was coming. We traded our best 2 receivers to get Young. Yes McCaffrey was our best and DJ was #2. We have to rebuild the group with whatever we can this year and upgrade as we go.

You seem to be obsessed with this #1 wr thing. First of all, the chemistry between he and Bryce has nothing to do with wr position that you are concerned with. Bruce has chemistry with several others as well. Secondly, it was always going to be receiver by committee. Chark is one of them. Third, Frank has clearly stated numerous times that any receiver that wants to make this team must be able to play all 3 positions at receiver. They must be able to play the x, y, and z position. So for the last time. No, Chark is not being depended on the be the "#1" receiver.

I think that is the way Frank wants it until game one. I also don't think they are done adding to it either.

A lot of assumptions in all of that.

Most likely. Unless they are in trade talks with someone I suspect there will be movement to get to 53. That doesn't mean they will be done however.

They run it in practice when there are no outside eyes looking in.

Because they haven't shown it yet.

The Nick Thurman? Why he's our secret weapon they've been hiding until game one. Honestly, I have no idea.