Cpt slay a ho

apparently you don't, multiple posters have said similar things then what I originally stated but you're hell bent on making this a DGB debate....when the topic has been dv in General.......give it a rest

wow you really just don't get it.........read the posts before i posted that......someone refer to hardy as a woman beater....... and what i post is what i meant, it had nothing to do with DGB solely i guess the older you get you start losing basic reading comprehension.........nice try

and now you're starting to look foolish...........my original post was about labeling someone a wife beater after one incident of DV, i didn't specifically refer to DGB i was speaking in general but good ole Mr.Scott and his superb reading comprehension came along going off half cock as always chalk up the L and admit you don't have anything useful to say.......save yourself some embarrassment

it was to prove a point but since you don't have a rebuttal worth a damn,i'll just take it as another one of your infamous choir boy post oh and btw you do know you can get a DV charge without laying a hand on someone right..........guess those people are "wife beaters" too aye?

nice strawman argument, if you stole something when you were 5 does that make you a thief for the rest of your life??? what about if you cheated on a test in highschool.............guess your a cheater for the rest of your life huh? tried pot once, then you're a drug addict better sign into rehab immediately by your logic(which is pretty dumb) you do something once that's what you're labeled.........there's no margin of error for the perfect Mr. Scott aye? people make mistakes but it's what they do after those mistakes that's important, did they learn from them or not?but you keep thinking you're on a higher pedestal then everyone else ..........but again that seems to be your M.O. lately

Yeah because one incident of DV makes you a woman beater.......gtfo

While nicks would have been a decent signing, I just don't like this rely on the draft mentality.......one mess up and were screwed at either ot or wr Not really a plan b for us

Yay another former panther we can all hate on.....who's next guys?since this is a yearly thing........ No name bench player calling out a pro bowl de.......when he doesn't even know what happen 100%

Hardy and the Panthers getting screwed over again.............Roger Goodell worst commissioner in sports

unless there's some prime evidence,this is a bs suspension IMO

We also drafted kug in the 4th the year before, he wasn't the bpa at that pick(IMO) but so many things to factor into that i wouldn't know the answer, but i'm sure when he drafted bene he was the bpa on our board otherwise we wouldn't have taken him. that's why bpa is a myth IMO and hard to break down when you don't know how high a team rates a player, my only gripe is the whole don't draft for need when considering bpa, but again it depends on the gm and their draft board. BPA is a good debate but in all honesty it's hard for anyone to pinpoint the concept

this The above is usually what's considered a bpa draft, and much of what I think DG has stated

true but why else would you trade up? IMO it's to get someone we /want not move up to take the bpa(which on our boards he could be the bpa). for example: if we trade up and get a Wr like White,instead of sitting at 25 and getting the bpa who could be gurley.By trading up,we address a position of need and we get our guy, instead of if we sat at 25 and got gurley,which isn't as big of a need as wr IMO but i can see why we wouldn't pass up on him.

anytime a team trades up they're doing it to get a guy they really like, if we trade up i'd assume were doing the same hypothetically,if we trade up i don't think we would do it just to get the bpa but to get somebody DG likes and doesn't think will make it to pick 25 therefore,in this particular situation i don't think bpa would apply

If we trade up there goes the bpa myth

Let's not act like Boston and bene don't have another year to prove they're solid players, definite liked what I've seen from both but it's a different story once coaches have tape on them

im not getting what you're trying to prove here,please explain

Hurney drafted Luke........not dg

We also could pick up a rb when that time comes instead of drafting gurley. Rb is the easiest plug and play position IMO, we barely could find a way to get both stew and d will involved enough I think that would be the same if we draft gurley.....there's not enough touches to go round unless a injury occurs.

Mad no but it would be a questionable pick, we could pick up a rb to spell Stewart. We have bigger needs then a rb in the first it's a luxury pick IMO

I hope this is last d will thread, the hate from some is oozing through my keyboard

I though oher sucked ?

Hardy

If true,this may bite us in the ass....especially if he signs in the division

ok........then why are you quoting me?......if you don't like someones opinion learn how to deal with it without being petty