Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Position upgrade that would improve our team the most? Why?


Gin and Juice

Recommended Posts

With all the talk about need a stud LT, do we really need a "stud"? The OL success comes as a unit, right? Been said countless times that OL is about chemistry.....not one great player! Does our OL need to improve? Yes, but it won't with one player....we had a pro bowl LT and we were mediocre at best on our OL. Stud LT the BPA for our team? I'm thinking not! What fixes our OL then? Discuss! ***save the cam can't throw from the ground**** I want depth in the response

Is a big play WR our BPA? I don't think so, however, a WR that commands double teams opens up our run game. Better run game keeps opposing Defenses honest, right? Upgrading our guards improve the run game? A true run blocking RT and RG? What says you? Cyril Richardson or Ja'Wann James truly our second Rd BPAs?

RB? Sure we claim to have a loaded stable. But, do we really? If the next AP is up for grabs, does that improve our team the most?

DE? We all know the cap issue and DG likes to fill the roster before the draft. Because of the cap, his philosophy is handcuffed. Will a stud DE be our BPA?

DT? As fans, we think we are set. Those big guys tire easily. Does three or more "starting" caliber DTs make our team better?

LB? We know the trials and tribulations of TD! He is an important piece! Does having a stand by guy of TD talent make our team better?

CB? Personally, I think a true shut down CB is the upgrade that improves our team the most! A guy that can truly cancel out the opposition's no.1. It's a no brainer in that the blitz package with our front seven can get stupid good! In turn, we create more turnover opportunities! My opinion only tho.

S? Shut down corner and our front seven the ballhawks at S should thrive!

Now, what are the risk that may cause our front seven to regress? Being on the field longer? Does having a better DL rotation improve our team the most?

I ask these question because I find BPA to be a relative term. He has to be the BPA for the team! I ask, what is that one positional upgrade that makes us a better team! It's not a stud LT, we had one and our OL was shabby at times!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we had a stud LT on a shabby line and he's gone now, what word would you use to describe the OL now? poo? i would.

 

you are insane if you think adding either a stud LT or WR wouldn't help the team more than any other positions. same could bebsaid about corner. we've got crappy choices. all three positions are weak. WR was  decimated and we've barely done anything to rebuild what we had that wasn't all that good to begin with. the OL was weak and made incredibly weaker and we've done NOTHING to help it out. 

 

if we don't address those two areas seriously during the draft in the first three rounds, we aren't getting better next year. upgrades there would absolutely help the team more than anything else.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the talk about need a stud LT, do we really need a "stud"? The OL success comes as a unit, right? Been said countless times that OL is about chemistry.....not one great player! Does our OL need to improve? Yes, but it won't with one player....we had a pro bowl LT and we were mediocre at best on our OL. Stud LT the BPA for our team? I'm thinking not! What fixes our OL then? Discuss! ***save the cam can't throw from the ground**** I want depth in the response

Is a big play WR our BPA? I don't think so, however, a WR that commands double teams opens up our run game. Better run game keeps opposing Defenses honest, right? Upgrading our guards improve the run game? A true run blocking RT and RG? What says you? Cyril Richardson or Ja'Wann James truly our second Rd BPAs?

RB? Sure we claim to have a loaded stable. But, do we really? If the next AP is up for grabs, does that improve our team the most?

DE? We all know the cap issue and DG likes to fill the roster before the draft. Because of the cap, his philosophy is handcuffed. Will a stud DE be our BPA?

DT? As fans, we think we are set. Those big guys tire easily. Does three or more "starting" caliber DTs make our team better?

LB? We know the trials and tribulations of TD! He is an important piece! Does having a stand by guy of TD talent make our team better?

CB? Personally, I think a true shut down CB is the upgrade that improves our team the most! A guy that can truly cancel out the opposition's no.1. It's a no brainer in that the blitz package with our front seven can get stupid good! In turn, we create more turnover opportunities! My opinion only tho.

S? Shut down corner and our front seven the ballhawks at S should thrive!

Now, what are the risk that may cause our front seven to regress? Being on the field longer? Does having a better DL rotation improve our team the most?

I ask these question because I find BPA to be a relative term. He has to be the BPA for the team! I ask, what is that one positional upgrade that makes us a better team! It's not a stud LT, we had one and our OL was shabby at times!

 

thats muh boy, who needs WR aim i right guys? what we need is RB, LB, DE in that order, thats how you win

 

OT is hit and miss from my pov..................... yeah offinsivelineman can come off the street and play. i mean like go to a frat house and find the five fatest bros and suit them up. it's all chemistry fellas

 

hurn dog out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if we had a stud LT on a shabby line and he's gone now, what word would you use to describe the OL now? poo? i would.

you are insane if you think adding either a stud LT or WR wouldn't help the team more than any other positions. same could bebsaid about corner. we've got crappy choices. all three positions are weak. WR was decimated and we've barely done anything to rebuild what we had that wasn't all that good to begin with. the OL was weak and made incredibly weaker and we've done NOTHING to help it out.

if we don't address those two areas seriously during the draft in the first three rounds, we aren't getting better next year. upgrades there would absolutely help the team more than anything else.

Damn dude. You think were gonna have a losing season. Don't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't argue that the fear of regressing is valid. But OL is about chemistry, not individuals

 

LOL that is terrible logic. Why not put 4 of my buddies and myself in there we got great chemistry. If 3 or 4 of the OL individually suck I don't care how much chemistry they have. 

 

If you look at the top teams they all have elite OL such as 49ers and Hawks. 

 

Do you think our OL can hold up against the Seahawks Defense? Did you see what they did to Peyton Manning and their elite group of WRs/TE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats muh boy, who needs WR aim i right guys? what we need is RB, LB, DE in that order, thats how you win

OT is hit and miss from my pov..................... yeah offinsivelineman can come off the street and play. i mean like go to a frat house and find the five fatest bros and suit them up. it's all chemistry fellas

hurn dog out

No, just no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL that is terrible logic. Why not put 4 of my buddies and myself in there we got great chemistry. If 3 or 4 of the OL individually suck I don't care how much chemistry they have.

If you look at the top teams they all have elite OL such as 49ers and Hawks.

Do you think our OL can hold up against the Seahawks Defense? Did you see what they did to Peyton Manning and their elite group of WRs/TE?

The hawks don't have an elite line, they can run block but not good in pass pro. But chemistry and continuity are really important on the oline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL that is terrible logic. Why not put 4 of my buddies and myself in there we got great chemistry. If 3 or 4 of the OL individually suck I don't care how much chemistry they have.

If you look at the top teams they all have elite OL such as 49ers and Hawks.

Do you think our OL can hold up against the Seahawks Defense? Did you see what they did to Peyton Manning and their elite group of WRs/TE?

I'm never said the OL doesn't need to improve! It needed to improve when we had a pro bowl LT. A stud LT does not make us better than last year, keeps us the same! Assuming we have a competent LT, what would make our OL better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn dude. You think were gonna have a losing season. Don't you?

didn't say that. i just don't see us doing better.

unless we do something to fix the OL and bring in at least one real receiving threat i think we'll be taking a step backward and while i don't expect it to be big enough for a losing season, it wouldn't surprise me.

if we really stick to this whole bpa thing, it's very likely that we go into the season with the offense as is. that isn't a good thing regardless of what that DL or LB corps looks like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...