Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers logo, revisited: It's NOT the shape of Carolina


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I found this mildly amusing piece on the Panthers logo.  At the end of the day it probably doesn't matter, but David Rappoccio has a valid point about the designers that designed it. They could have---and probably should have---done a better job.  A simple change in angle makes a world of difference. That's why he is calling "Bullshit!", to the notion that it is in the shape of the Carolinas.

 

panthers1.jpg

Seeing is believing, right?  It looks kind of fuged when you view the overlay.

 

Designers are smart people who know their craft. Why would a designer make a logo resemble another shape, but only when the logo is tilted? They wouldn’t, because professional designers aren’t stupid. The logo was designed to have the head face forward at a level angle, with the neck curling downwards, which is not the angle of the Carolinas. A good designer would not design a logo to resemble a shape only when the logo is tilted at an unnatural angle. That would be what we call a bad designer.

If the logo was to be designed in the shape of the Carolinas, the logo would look something like this:

 

 

 

Panthers4.jpg

 

 

 

 

I know that most people probably don't give a poo, but Rappoccio is right.  How in the hell can designers get paid millions of dollars come up with a design that is supposed to be in the shape of the Carolinas that is not the shape of the Carolinas? Just like the writer said, perhaps they didn't.  perhaps it was something that someone came up with after the fact, and someone just went with it.

And now, all of us fans have really been duped into going with it as well.   

 

In my opinion they need to "fix" it, and have it more closely resemble the two states so that it really does give the logo more meaning. Until then, I am inclined to think somewhat like Rappoccio.

 

The fact is, the Carolina logo is just an angry animal head. Which I’ve alluded to before is a common and boring theme in sports logos.

 

I said that I think somewhat like him because at the end of the day, "angry animal head" or not, I still think that it's a cool logo.  Its just that it would be cooler if it was more closely shaped like the states that it is supposed to represent---in part, the place where I was born and have lived for most of my life. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth I think the Patriots logo is the dumbest looking thing ever. Same with the Broncos, Dolphins, Ravens, and Jags.

 

The Browns...now THERE is a logo.  Amirite?

 

 

P.S.  I edited this just to see if the "edit thing" still shows up.

 

P.P.S.  It does.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe if you squinted more....and drank, I don't know.....a beer or twelve you would see it.

 

I see it perfectly.

 

 

I saw it too...before I looked at the overlay.  The fact is that many people believe Carolinians are just a bunch of ass backwards country bumpkins anyway.  I can just see someone saying, "Ahh, hell, those dumb fugs won't notice anyway."  :lol:

 

It does kind of feel like The Emperor Has No Clothes right about now.

 

The designer must have been a South Car---err Yankee. :P

 

The designer must have had a few while he was designing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To start with, you wouldn’t want to count up that value chart. You would see quickly where that is headed. But you basically did a quantity comparison, while ignoring quality.  I am looking at 2023 as the start, because it became all about Bryce.  2023 you have 4 picks plus DJ Moore for offense vs 2 (80 and 145) for defense.  2024 you got the 1st overall, the 32, the 46 and the 101 for offense vs 72, 157, 200 and 240 for defense. Leave the FA IOL out of it. Which was a crazy big  investment. But it wasn’t draft.  Anyway, that is basically 4 top 100 picks for offense and 4 picks for defense in 2024. Except they were 2 first rounders, the second rounder, and the 4th was really high at 101. Vs 72 and day three stuff. Please….  Second quoted/bolded… See you think we hate Bryce. That isn’t it at all. It is nice easy way to characterize us and discredit our talking points though.   Me, I do mostly hate watching him play. But I don’t hate the person. I hate the hell out of the stanning.  It started with the very first question I asked about his footwork, arm strength, and size. Height being the principle objection. I never even got to the durability factor. There was plenty without factoring that in.  But there was rabid opposition to even asking the question of what a couple of small fractions of a second extra closing time would do for the defenders.  What the extra time it takes to flip the hips would do vs a pass rush or on the other end after the ball is in the air. Split second more for recognition where it is going for the DBs.  The tippy toe backpedal.  That poo was a mess and it has always been mess but no Bryce fan wanted to hear it. “Go get another team to root for”. “It worked in the SEC it will be fine in the NFL you don’t know football you are just a hater”.  It got worse when the real games started. It has never stopped. It is nice that many people have left that train so there is less abuse but it hasn’t stopped.  So whatever… 
    • Whatever school you attended, I don't know and I don't care, but I would suggest demanding a refund.    Something was completely missed there.
    • The draft capital since since 2023 has in no way been pretty even.  Especially when you zero in on day 1 and day 2 draft picks.  Draft capital has vastly gone toward the O over D.  
×
×
  • Create New...