Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WE ARE ALL WITNESSES.

Night Prowler X

By Night Prowler X,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

Night Prowler X Newbie

Night Prowler X

Posted
Posted

NBA Finals-

LeBron- 2-2 record (10-12 W/L)

Jordan- 6-0 record (24-11 W/L)

LeBron- 2x Champion, 2x MVP

Jordan- 6x Champion, 6x MVP

LeBron- 44% FG, 29% 3-Pt, 75% FT

Jordan- 48% FG, 37% 3-Pt, 81% FT

LeBron- 23.4 Pts, 9.0 Reb, 7.0 Ast

Jordan- 33.6 Pts, 6.0 Reb, 6.0 Ast

LeBron- 1.7 Stl, 0.6 Blk, 3.8 t/o

Jordan- 1.8 Stl, 0.7 Blk, 2.4 t/o

Olympics-

LeBron- 2x Gold Medalist, 1x Bronze Medalist

Jordan- 2x Gold Medalist

LeBron James has lost in both the NBA Finals & Olympics. That's an accomplishment Michael Jordan could never achieve. LeBron will forever hold these achievements over Jordan.

All hail King James, we are all witnesses!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FearTheCats Explorer

FearTheCats

Posted
Posted

I give LeBron a pass for 2007. That was probably the least talented team to ever make the finals other than LeBron. They had no chance whatsoever against the Spurs. I'm not going to compare LeBron to Jordan until LeBron's career is over. I also think that Jordan probably would have won 1-2 more titles if he didn't leave for baseball.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites
yasuhara2241 Contributor

yasuhara2241

Posted
Posted

No point comparing. Two different eras and two different positions. But in spirit of the OP, I will give my opinion which I will try to keep as unbiased as possible, but the fact that I hate Lebron makes this difficult. 

 

MJ in my eyes will forever be GOAT. The competitiveness that he has beats out on any player since. Lebron is the most physically imposing player ever. I compare him and Magic moreso than him and MJ due to the size and passing ability.

 

Also Im hoping Lebron doesn't ever beat 6 championships because I am one of the ppl that feels ripped off by him teaming with Wade and Bosh. I don't blame him and don't feel it takes away from the championships or his play but on a personal note I want him to not surpass MJ for that reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Night Prowler X Newbie

Night Prowler X

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The 07 Cavs were the worst Finals team ever. LeBron carrying those bums to the finals was a showing of his greatness.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

translation:

LeBron getting swept in the Finals shows his greatness.

The 06-07 Cavs supporting cast was just as good as the 90-91 Bulls. Keep making Bron Bron lame excuses. Jordan's first championship team was not that good. Jordan was the only all star on that team. Grant & Pippen were both very solid but neither were stars. 90-91 was before Pippen emerged as a star. The other 2 starters, Paxson & Cartwright, as well as the entire bench, were complete garbage. Gooden, Hughes, & Ilgauskas were good players back in 06-07. They all had very good years. The Cavs bench was 100x more productive.

NBA Finals (91 vs 07)

Fg%-Pts-Reb-Ast-Stl-Blk-Tov

Jordan- 56% 31 7 12 3 2 3

LeBron- 36% 22 7 7 1 1 6

Bulls- 51% 70 pts 32 reb 16 ast 7 stl 3 blk 9 tov

Cavs- 41% 60 pts 34 reb 10 ast 5 stl 2 blk 5 tov

The biggest difference in those teams was Jordan vs LeBron, not the supporting casts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dorian Gray Proficient

Dorian Gray

Posted
Posted

The 06-07 Cavs supporting cast was just as good as the 90-91 Bulls.

 

Jordan

Pippen

Grant

Armstrong

Cartwright

 

vs

 

LeBron

Ilgauskas

Gooden

Pavolvic

Hughes

 

 

You can't be serious.  You can make fun of LeBron about a lot of things, but the 07 Cavs were trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MCC Newbie

MCC

Posted
Posted

10378938_472521346213282_225275584728864

This argument is stupid. MJ and Kobe didn't have to go team up with others because they already had allstars and hall of famers on their teams.

Why can't we just say both are great players and leave it at that?

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Night Prowler X Newbie

Night Prowler X

Posted
  • Author
Posted

This argument is stupid. MJ and Kobe didn't have to go team up with others because they already had allstars and hall of famers on their teams.

Why can't we just say both are great players and leave it at that?

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

There wasn't an all star or hofer on the 91 Bulls. Just Jordan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...