Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WE ARE ALL WITNESSES.


Recommended Posts

NBA Finals-

LeBron- 2-2 record (10-12 W/L)

Jordan- 6-0 record (24-11 W/L)

LeBron- 2x Champion, 2x MVP

Jordan- 6x Champion, 6x MVP

LeBron- 44% FG, 29% 3-Pt, 75% FT

Jordan- 48% FG, 37% 3-Pt, 81% FT

LeBron- 23.4 Pts, 9.0 Reb, 7.0 Ast

Jordan- 33.6 Pts, 6.0 Reb, 6.0 Ast

LeBron- 1.7 Stl, 0.6 Blk, 3.8 t/o

Jordan- 1.8 Stl, 0.7 Blk, 2.4 t/o

Olympics-

LeBron- 2x Gold Medalist, 1x Bronze Medalist

Jordan- 2x Gold Medalist

LeBron James has lost in both the NBA Finals & Olympics. That's an accomplishment Michael Jordan could never achieve. LeBron will forever hold these achievements over Jordan.

All hail King James, we are all witnesses!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I give LeBron a pass for 2007. That was probably the least talented team to ever make the finals other than LeBron. They had no chance whatsoever against the Spurs. I'm not going to compare LeBron to Jordan until LeBron's career is over. I also think that Jordan probably would have won 1-2 more titles if he didn't leave for baseball.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No point comparing. Two different eras and two different positions. But in spirit of the OP, I will give my opinion which I will try to keep as unbiased as possible, but the fact that I hate Lebron makes this difficult. 

 

MJ in my eyes will forever be GOAT. The competitiveness that he has beats out on any player since. Lebron is the most physically imposing player ever. I compare him and Magic moreso than him and MJ due to the size and passing ability.

 

Also Im hoping Lebron doesn't ever beat 6 championships because I am one of the ppl that feels ripped off by him teaming with Wade and Bosh. I don't blame him and don't feel it takes away from the championships or his play but on a personal note I want him to not surpass MJ for that reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 07 Cavs were the worst Finals team ever. LeBron carrying those bums to the finals was a showing of his greatness.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

translation:

LeBron getting swept in the Finals shows his greatness.

The 06-07 Cavs supporting cast was just as good as the 90-91 Bulls. Keep making Bron Bron lame excuses. Jordan's first championship team was not that good. Jordan was the only all star on that team. Grant & Pippen were both very solid but neither were stars. 90-91 was before Pippen emerged as a star. The other 2 starters, Paxson & Cartwright, as well as the entire bench, were complete garbage. Gooden, Hughes, & Ilgauskas were good players back in 06-07. They all had very good years. The Cavs bench was 100x more productive.

NBA Finals (91 vs 07)

Fg%-Pts-Reb-Ast-Stl-Blk-Tov

Jordan- 56% 31 7 12 3 2 3

LeBron- 36% 22 7 7 1 1 6

Bulls- 51% 70 pts 32 reb 16 ast 7 stl 3 blk 9 tov

Cavs- 41% 60 pts 34 reb 10 ast 5 stl 2 blk 5 tov

The biggest difference in those teams was Jordan vs LeBron, not the supporting casts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 06-07 Cavs supporting cast was just as good as the 90-91 Bulls.

 

Jordan

Pippen

Grant

Armstrong

Cartwright

 

vs

 

LeBron

Ilgauskas

Gooden

Pavolvic

Hughes

 

 

You can't be serious.  You can make fun of LeBron about a lot of things, but the 07 Cavs were trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10378938_472521346213282_225275584728864

This argument is stupid. MJ and Kobe didn't have to go team up with others because they already had allstars and hall of famers on their teams.

Why can't we just say both are great players and leave it at that?

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This argument is stupid. MJ and Kobe didn't have to go team up with others because they already had allstars and hall of famers on their teams.

Why can't we just say both are great players and leave it at that?

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

There wasn't an all star or hofer on the 91 Bulls. Just Jordan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...