Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hornets Are Interested In McDermott At #9?


rscott94

Recommended Posts

If he was even semi-athletic and quick I'd say go for it.

But.... he's a tweener who is too small to guard four's and too slow to guard three's.

Not to mention the three's that guard him are going to be so much more a athletic than him that he may not even be able to score at a consistent rate.

It's just an awful fit.

That would literally ruin the momentum they are building.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People keep talking about how unathletic he is because... well we know why. His standing reach was if I recall 8'7 which isn't great but not terrible either. Plus he finished in top third of everyone at the combine in athleticism drills.

He is more athletic than people give him credit for. He also moves his feet pretty well. He is also one of the most efficient shooters to come out in a while. He is #1 at DX in shooting effeciency in all three of their categories, which are catch and shoot, off screens, and off the dribble.

He can play PF too. He may have some problems on defense at PF but he will cause a world of problems for opposing defenses at PF especially on pick and rolls and iso for Big Al.

Some people worry about being able to create his own shot, but there are ways to create a shot for yourself that doesn't include dribbling the ball around with a bunch of crossovers.

At the very worst I think he will be a Korver type, at best he will be a Chris Mullin type

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McDermott is a tweener, historically tweener's don't succeed in the NBA.

McDermott could surprise and be a solid player but history is not on his side and the Charlotte franchise can not afford to make any more mistakes in the draft.

It's time to go the safe route, whoever that may be.

 

 

I agree.... On exception most tweeners cant shoot. 

 

On subject of tweeners that is why I dont want Aaron Gordon.

 

The pick really depends on who is there... Everyone keeps throwing names out that are not realistic on who will be there....

 

When draft comes and top 8 gone already are: Wiggins, Embiid, Parker, Exum, Gordon, Smart, Vonleh, and Randle. Who is next on your big board?

 

Few names in no particular order yet: McDermott, Stauskas, Gary Harris, Zach LaVine, and Adrian Payne. Who else do you consider? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.... On exception most tweeners cant shoot.

On subject of tweeners that is why I dont want Aaron Gordon.

The pick really depends on who is there... Everyone keeps throwing names out that are not realistic on who will be there....

When draft comes and top 8 gone already are: Wiggins, Embiid, Parker, Exum, Gordon, Smart, Vonleh, and Randle. Who is next on your big board?

Few names in no particular order yet: McDermott, Stauskas, Gary Harris, Zach LaVine, and Adrian Payne. Who else do you consider?

Right now the two guys I'm looking at are Stauskas and Saric.

I believe Stauskas is a guy that could come in and put up points right away. Consistency and an ability to create his own shot might be a problem, but he's a great spot up shooter and he runs the pick and pop really well (something that we incorporate into our offense quote a bit). Defense might also be an issue but he's so young that he can learn.

Saric is the other guy I'm looking at. He's probably the most underrated prospect in this draft and he's a great fit for our offense. He plays like McBob's except he his 2X better. There's a reason people are calling him to next Toni Kukoc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.... On exception most tweeners cant shoot.

On subject of tweeners that is why I dont want Aaron Gordon.

The pick really depends on who is there... Everyone keeps throwing names out that are not realistic on who will be there....

When draft comes and top 8 gone already are: Wiggins, Embiid, Parker, Exum, Gordon, Smart, Vonleh, and Randle. Who is next on your big board?

Few names in no particular order yet: McDermott, Stauskas, Gary Harris, Zach LaVine, and Adrian Payne. Who else do you consider?

Stauskas, Lavine or Payne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing about his game impresses me in the slightest.  If we draft him it will set the franchise back 10 years.  His game actually reminds me of Adam Morrison.

 

Why do people keep saying this??  His game is nothing like Morrison's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...