Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lance: Market Value vs Your Value

bLACKpANTHER

By bLACKpANTHER,
in Charlotte Hornets

What would you pay for Lance?  

19 members have voted

  1. 1. What should be the market value of Lance?

    • $6 mil @ year
      0
    • $7 mil @ year
      5
    • $8 mil @ year
      7
    • $9 mil @ year
      4
    • $10 mil @ year +
      3

  2. 2. What would you be willing to pay to make him a Hornet?

    • $6 mil @ year
      3
    • $7 mil @ year
      3
    • $8 mil @ year
      4
    • $9 mil @ year
      5
    • $10 mil @ year +
      4

  3. 3. What do you think Lance will make in FA?

    • $6 mil @ year
      0
    • $7 mil @ year
      2
    • $8 mil @ year
      2
    • $9 mil @ year
      4
    • $10 mil @ year +
      11

Recommended Posts

yasuhara2241 Contributor

yasuhara2241

Posted
Posted

I said I think his market value should be around $9m. As the Hornets and due to his craziness I would only pay $7m. I do think someone in the league will overpay 10m+. 

 

This all being said. I do not want him on our team. If it happens I will support it but he is definitely on my do not want list. I do not want his crazy antics on my team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

He's going to get more than 9 mil you guys are in over your head if you think a guy with his production isn't going to get 8 figures

Sent from my SGH-M919 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Agree.

He's more in the range of 9mil per season, but he'll probably get $11-12. I don't think he'll get more than 12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaNCSU Proficient

CarolinaNCSU

Posted
Posted

Just some snippets from Zach Lowe's Grantland article on the subject, including thoughts about Charlotte being one of the 3 contenders for his services...As he finishes the article, he states (as below) that some teams think/hope he cost himself money and that the market starts in the 6-8 range. But, he also says a team (he mentions the Lakers) could get ballsy and throw out a 1 year, 15 million type deal or one that is incentive laden. 

 

"Stephenson should fit any long-term picture the Pacers have of themselves; they know him best and he’s comfortable there. But price could be an issue. Indiana is hoping Stephenson has cost himself some money, and there are lots of teams waiting around to see if the market starts in the $6 million–$8 million range — a spot at which they might dive in. The Pacers would outbid that, but it takes only one daring team to take a leap and smash that market apart."

 

Charlotte Hornets: Michael Jordan is talking big, and the Bobcats have money to spend. Gerald Henderson and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist are nice players, but MKG is in the midst of a full-blown shot reconstruction, and Henderson can’t reliably shoot from deep or create off the bounce.

Stephenson would provide some juice for an offense that needs it, as well as ensure that Kemba Walker isn’t overburdened. He just spent four years learning a defensive system that isn’t much different from what Steve Clifford runs. Charlotte got a taste of winning, and they’re hungry for more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • Jay Roosevelt
      fug the HATERS

      By Jay Roosevelt · Posted

      I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • Martin
      fug the HATERS

      By Martin · Posted

      I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...