Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitch McGary at #24 a "Lock"?

bLACKpANTHER

By bLACKpANTHER,
in Charlotte Hornets

Recommended Posts

bLACKpANTHER Proficient

bLACKpANTHER

Posted
Posted

I didn't hear about this a few days ago-- but apparently Mitch McGary has canceled a lot of workouts because someone in the 20s has promised to take him. Then this came out:

 

 

 

Hearing Hornets at 24 most likely destination for Mitch McGary to land. Source says they are the culprit of his draft workout shutdown

http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140624/SPORTS0201/306240107/Hornets-likely-destination-Michigan-s-Mitch-McGary-ESPN-s-Ford-says

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chuckie Newbie

Chuckie

Posted
Posted

The more I read about this the more content if this is the pick. He's a development guy for sure. He's a good team player, has character, hustles on the floor. His offensive game needs work and his FT % is complete crap but he can work on those.

I'm only going to be pissed if he can't pass a physical, only if that happens have we wasted the pick.

If he recovers 100% and returned to college he might have been a lottery pick next year. Also, we probably got some information on the guy from other Michigan players passing through. Also think his work ethic is playing a large part on the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

MJ has a crush on "white" guys foreal if we go with McD and McG!!!!!

(1) Morrison

(2) Zeller

(3) McD

(4) McG

This would seriously be the worst draft ever if we did both these dumb ass moves.

I would put Cho under Marty Hurney for this stupid poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rscott94 Newbie

rscott94

Posted
Posted

If it is true I bet Cho is taking PJ at 9.

Honestly I'm fine with PJ at 9 there's most likely better options there but still.. All homerism aside I think he's going to be a great pro and fits what we need perfectly

#9 Hairston

#24 Warren

Would be great IMO

I really don't want McDermott or McGary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon Snow
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...