Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitch McGary at #24 a "Lock"?


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

I didn't hear about this a few days ago-- but apparently Mitch McGary has canceled a lot of workouts because someone in the 20s has promised to take him. Then this came out:

 

 

 

Hearing Hornets at 24 most likely destination for Mitch McGary to land. Source says they are the culprit of his draft workout shutdown

http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140624/SPORTS0201/306240107/Hornets-likely-destination-Michigan-s-Mitch-McGary-ESPN-s-Ford-says

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I read about this the more content if this is the pick. He's a development guy for sure. He's a good team player, has character, hustles on the floor. His offensive game needs work and his FT % is complete crap but he can work on those.

I'm only going to be pissed if he can't pass a physical, only if that happens have we wasted the pick.

If he recovers 100% and returned to college he might have been a lottery pick next year. Also, we probably got some information on the guy from other Michigan players passing through. Also think his work ethic is playing a large part on the pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MJ has a crush on "white" guys foreal if we go with McD and McG!!!!!

(1) Morrison

(2) Zeller

(3) McD

(4) McG

This would seriously be the worst draft ever if we did both these dumb ass moves.

I would put Cho under Marty Hurney for this stupid poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is true I bet Cho is taking PJ at 9.

Honestly I'm fine with PJ at 9 there's most likely better options there but still.. All homerism aside I think he's going to be a great pro and fits what we need perfectly

#9 Hairston

#24 Warren

Would be great IMO

I really don't want McDermott or McGary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
    • Canes now have 19 losses on the year. Here is the truly alarming stat. 13 of those were multiple goal loses. 9 of those were 3 goal plus losses. This team is getting blown out more than any other year under Rod.     why?  Blue line is a total mess. It’s just no good with their combinations.  It pains me to say this, but they were mikes better with Burns and Orlov. They need Slavin so bad.  Health.  Size. The team is too small and has no physical play. Most forwards do not forecheck.  Worst under Rod.  Goalie play. Pretty average to sub par. PK is downright bad. It’s allowing a little over a goal a game. Worst under Rod.    Team will not win a playoff round under its current group of players. It’s not constructed to do so against heavy teams.      solutions.  Must get physical size by the trade deadline. Rod and Tulsky know this. That probably has to come with the 2C.  KKs size but a better scorer and meaner.  The need another physical winger.  Goalie. Either go all in on a top guy on a bad team or get average. Lastly, better defense. Need a Right shot heavy defenseman.  Yes that could mean someone’s favorite dman could sit. Looking at you Boom.    thats 3-4 new guys that must be brought in for them to have a chance at a cup.  And it’s all players that are different and better than what they have.  They have the cap. KK is gone. Add 4 mill back.    And then hope it’s jells unlike Mikko.  
×
×
  • Create New...