Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Right now, we're the 2002-2004 Falcons


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

If you look at the way the team approached last season, you'll notice they concentrated a fair amount on the run game.  In this case, a run game which included (some would say was powered by) our quarterback.  The passing game was there and decent, but it was the run game that was the engine of the offense.  And on the other side, an attacking, smothering defense.

 

Now, if you think back about ten years or so, that style of play might seem familiar.

 

It's what the Atlanta Falcons of the early 2000s used when Vick was at his peak with them.  Their run game, Vick included, was deadly.  The pass game - at its best - was complementary but hardly frightening.

 

So now that we have a quarterback who can beat teams with his legs, here we were last season using a similar approach.

 

Aaaaand honestly, I'm not in favor of that :(

 

Why?

 

The Falcons taking that approach was understandable, even wise when you think about it.  Vick was an amazing runner, but a mediocre passer.  Teams knew the best game plan against the Falcons was to concentrate on the run and force Vick to throw.  Hence, the 'mush rush' by many, except the Bucs who always used heavy pressure to flush Vick to his right where he wasn't as effective.

 

Still, the run game was so good that even when teams did their best to take it away, they didn't always succeed.

 

So now, we take a similar path because we have a quarterback with a similar profile, right?

 

Cool, except we don't :unsure:

 

Cam Newton is, in only his fourth year, a better passer than Michael Vick was even in his best years.  Yes, he's also a great runner and it's wise to use that quality and/or the threat of it.  But in the process, let's not get unbalanced too far toward the run.

 

Now I'd imagine the coaches know this, so perhaps it's just been the lack of a deep receiving corps that's forced them into that approach.  It seems more logical when you think about it.  Newton, although sometimes lacking consistency, is still a good passer, but of course someone has to catch the ball.

 

Truthfully though, the reason behind why we went that route last year doesn't really matter.

 

The bottom line for me is that I don't want to see us looking that way again this coming season

 

With a deeper receiving corps, another year under Newton's belt and a super-talented mega-tall receiver as a target, there's no reason why we shouldn't air it out as much as anybody.  Rivera's preference has always been to be able to attack teams any way we choose, and that's exactly what I want to see in the year ahead.

 

Here's hoping we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like this comparison. Nope, not one bit.

1620371_4042612999389_2031858434_n.jpg?o

 

I expect some flack for comparing us to the Falcons :lol:

 

To be fair, those teams won their fair share of games, made it into the playoffs and almost made the Super Bowl.

 

I'm hoping for better though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Cam's passing ability should be highlighted, but the Seahawks just dominated the Super Bowl by having an elite defense and an elite run game to control the clock. What we really need is balance. We need teams to stack the box for the run so we can be able to get single coverage and get a chunk through the air. Then they drop a couple back, and bam we smash it right down the middle for 5 yards or more. Need to keep them guessing. But I will say controlling the clock and pounding the ball by running it and using duel TEs could work really really well for us. I don't think we should emphasize passing this year much more than last year just because our tackles are so questionable. Our WRs are better than last year and with Cam, good enough to be a top 10 team in passing stats. But I don't think we can do that until we've got some safety for Cam in the pocket. Our interior line should be much better so I think we do need to go with the run game here. The difference between us and those Falcons? Our defense vs. theirs. We have an elite defense now and should build around that more than our offense. They had in 2002 the 8th ranked defense, in 2003, the 30th and in 2004 the 14th. We need to be consistently in the top 3 defensively. The Patriots won 3 Super Bowls by being efficient on offense with the run game and a game manager QB (lets be honest, that's what Brady was at that point in his career). They were built around a balanced offense slightly leaned toward the run and a top 3 (or #1) defense. Could we be a powerhouse passing team like the recent Patriots or the recent Broncos? Sure. But I don't think we want to be or should be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect some flack for comparing us to the Falcons :lol:

To be fair, those teams won their fair share of games, made it into the playoffs and almost made the Super Bowl.

I'm hoping for better though.

Welp they did have our number for a while so I guess we better hope the majority of our opponents are built like the 2002-2004 panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Cam's passing ability should be highlighted, but the Seahawks just dominated the Super Bowl by having an elite defense and an elite run game to control the clock. What we really need is balance. We need teams to stack the box for the run so we can be able to get single coverage and get a chunk through the air. Then they drop a couple back, and bam we smash it right down the middle for 5 yards or more. Need to keep them guessing. But I will say controlling the clock and pounding the ball by running it and using duel TEs could work really really well for us. I don't think we should emphasize passing this year much more than last year just because our tackles are so questionable. Our WRs are better than last year and with Cam, good enough to be a top 10 team in passing stats. But I don't think we can do that until we've got some safety for Cam in the pocket. Our interior line should be much better so I think we do need to go with the run game here. The difference between us and those Falcons? Our defense vs. theirs. We have an elite defense now and should build around that more than our offense. They had in 2002 the 8th ranked defense, in 2003, the 30th and in 2004 the 14th. We need to be consistently in the top 3 defensively. The Patriots won 3 Super Bowls by being efficient on offense with the run game and a game manager QB (lets be honest, that's what Brady was at that point in his career). They were built around a balanced offense slightly leaned toward the run and a top 3 (or #1) defense. Could we be a powerhouse passing team like the recent Patriots or the recent Broncos? Sure. But I don't think we want to be or should be. 

 

And here's the thing on the Seahawks...

 

Seattle turned Wilson into a game manager.  Yes, it worked, but Newton is too dynamic to be put in that sort of box and I don't think it'd be a wise use of his talents.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welp they did have our number for a while so I guess we better hope the majority of our opponents are built like the 2002-2004 panthers

 

I know in 2002 Del Rio had no clue how to defend Vick.  Honestly, his career since the Panthers hadn't exactly shown strength against other mobile QBs either.

 

Trgovac might have had a better handle on the concepts (surprising as that sounds) but until we drafted Thomas Davis he didn't have the right tools for the job.

 

Once TD came aboard though, things started changing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Damn the Tankers are already out here talking bout tanking?  
    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
×
×
  • Create New...