Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Bersin Start?


Woodcookedbbq

Recommended Posts

What makes him Not ready?  Runs good routes, get separation and catches the ball?  Am I missing something?  He plays with the same squad as King and as been just as productive.

 

So I don't see your logic as to why King is ready but Bersin isn't?

 

No you are right.  Inexperience is the reason I said that.  Not many WRs do well early on.  If you look at my other posts, I am in favor of Bersin playing #2, I just figure he needs time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can allow Haurki Nakumura to start for us, then I don't think it would hurt to let Bersin get some serious burn for a game or two.

So.... Because we made a terrible decision and allowed a very poor safety start on defense a couple of years ago, you think that justifies allowing an undrafted kid from Wofford to start at receiver for us this season? You must be a fan of the Chewbacca defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...